back_to_rankings
Fedi El Air portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Fedi El Air

Shooting Guard · TUN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

193 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

3
film items
0
scout badges
On file
scout report

01

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

  • Clipvs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip
  • Clipvs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip

02

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-15

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker

off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Secondary creation, Advantage extension, Off-ball value.

Now · Off GuardNow · WingProjects · Off GuardProjects · Wing

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

  • · Secondary creation
  • · Advantage extension
  • · Off-ball value

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker.

Defensive assignments

primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Secondary creation · Advantage extension

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

3 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

NCAA D2

NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

64.2 performance rating · rank 50 · 6 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 78.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

38.0% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

62.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.

03

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #50 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

64.2

Event performance

64th event percentile

PI

62.9

Prospect index

64th event percentile

ORtg

78.3

Points / 100 poss.

58th event percentile

DRtg

73.8

Lower is better

58th event percentile

NRtg

+4.4

Two-way margin

62nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 78.3 · 58th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 73.8 · Stop% 62.2% · Team DRtg 72.7

Sample context

6 games · 183 minutes · 75% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.3 APG84th event percentile

Rebounding

6.7 RPG84th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

64.2

64th event percentile

Prospect index

62.9

64th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

78.3

58th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

73.8

58th event percentile

Two-way margin

+4.4

62nd event percentile

Stop percentage

62.2%

55th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.7 PPG

77th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

84th event percentile

Rebounding

6.7 RPG

84th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

63rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

40.7% TS

63rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 78.3 ORtg and 73.8 DRtg, producing a +4.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    2.3 APG

    84th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Rebounding

    6.7 RPG

    84th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  3. Scoring load

    8.7 PPG

    77th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

78.3

58th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.7 PPG

77th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

40.7%

63rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

35.6%

55th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

32.7%

63rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

15.8%

context

3.2 attempts per game

Free throws

55.6%

56th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

38.0%

64th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

84th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

73.8

58th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.2

53rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

62.2%

55th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

63rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

45.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+4.4

62nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.0

64th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

64.2

64th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

62.9

64th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.9%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.7 RPG

84th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

183.0

context

30.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

75.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#50

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

476.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

04

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

8.7

PPG

6.7

RPG

2.3

APG

#50

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#3

RANK

34

FIELD

94%

PERCENTILE

10.5

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

8.7

PPG

6.7

RPG

2.3

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

4

GP

10.5

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.3

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Havanirina Theidy Raveloson portrait#48

    Havanirina Theidy Raveloson

    Power Forward · Madagascar

    6.0 PPG 5.8 RPG 2.0 APG

05

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

10.5

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.3

APG

0.8

SPG

0.5

BPG

—

3P%

49%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #50

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.7

PPG

6.7

RPG

2.3

APG

2.8

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

41%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.7

P77

Playmaking

2.3

P84

Rebounding

6.7

P84

True shooting

41%

P63

Two-way impact

+4.4

P62

Stops

62%

P55

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

33%

17 made / 52 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

16%

3 made / 19 attempts

FT

Free throws

56%

15 made / 27 attempts

Shot selection

37% of attempts from three

●2PA 33●3PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

52

PTS

8.7 / game

17–52

FGM–FGA

3–19

3PM–3PA

15–27

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

17

TOV

2.8 / game

0.82×

AST:TOV

28

FD

rebounding

40

REB

6.7 / game

13

OREB

27

DREB

6.7

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.5 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

10

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64.2

HESI

62.9

PI

78.3

ORtg

73.8

DRtg

+4.4

NRtg

+2.0

Stable NRtg

62%

Stop%

38%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

9%

PIE

72.7

Team DRtg

-1.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games183 minutes30.5 min/game75% sample weightrank #50 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #3

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.5

PPG

8.5

RPG

2.3

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

49%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.5

P90

Playmaking

2.3

P69

Rebounding

8.5

P99

True shooting

49%

P81

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

8 made / 27 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

30%

3 made / 10 attempts

FT

Free throws

64%

23 made / 36 attempts

Shot selection

37% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

42

PTS

10.5 / game

8–27

FGM–FGA

3–10

3PM–3PA

23–36

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

2.3 / game

7

TOV

1.8 / game

1.29×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

34

REB

8.5 / game

11

OREB

23

DREB

8.5

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.8 / game

2

BLK

0.5 / game

7

PF

5

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

35%

eFG%

10%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #3 of 34

06

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.