ORtg
78.3
58th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Shooting Guard · TUN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
193 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-15 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-15
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Secondary creation, Advantage extension, Off-ball value.
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Secondary creation · Advantage extension
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive64.2 performance rating · rank 50 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 78.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive38.0% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive62.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #50 of 138 · Established
HESI
64.2
Event performance
64th event percentile
PI
62.9
Prospect index
64th event percentile
ORtg
78.3
Points / 100 poss.
58th event percentile
DRtg
73.8
Lower is better
58th event percentile
NRtg
+4.4
Two-way margin
62nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 78.3 · 58th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.8 · Stop% 62.2% · Team DRtg 72.7
Sample context
6 games · 183 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Rebounding
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
64.2
64th event percentile
Prospect index
62.9
64th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
78.3
58th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.8
58th event percentile
Two-way margin
+4.4
62nd event percentile
Stop percentage
62.2%
55th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
8.7 PPG
77th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
84th event percentile
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
84th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
63rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
40.7% TS
63rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 78.3 ORtg and 73.8 DRtg, producing a +4.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and scoring load.
Creation
2.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
8.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
78.3
58th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
8.7 PPG
77th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
40.7%
63rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
35.6%
55th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.7%
63rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
15.8%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
55.6%
56th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.0%
64th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
84th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.8
58th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.2
53rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.2%
55th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
63rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
45.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+4.4
62nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.0
64th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
64.2
64th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
62.9
64th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.9%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.7 RPG
84th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
183.0
context30.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
75.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#50
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
476.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.7
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.3
APG
#50
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#3
RANK
34
FIELD
94%
PERCENTILE
10.5
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.7
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
4
GP
10.5
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#50
of 138 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
10.5
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
49%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #50
//quick_read
8.7
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.3
APG
2.8
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
41%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.7
P77
Playmaking
2.3
P84
Rebounding
6.7
P84
True shooting
41%
P63
Two-way impact
+4.4
P62
Stops
62%
P55
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
33%
17 made / 52 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
16%
3 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
56%
15 made / 27 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
52
PTS
8.7 / game
17–52
FGM–FGA
3–19
3PM–3PA
15–27
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
17
TOV
2.8 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
28
FD
rebounding
40
REB
6.7 / game
13
OREB
27
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
10
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
64.2
HESI
62.9
PI
78.3
ORtg
73.8
DRtg
+4.4
NRtg
+2.0
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
9%
PIE
72.7
Team DRtg
-1.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #3
//quick_read
10.5
PPG
8.5
RPG
2.3
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.5
P90
Playmaking
2.3
P69
Rebounding
8.5
P99
True shooting
49%
P81
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
8 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
23 made / 36 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
42
PTS
10.5 / game
8–27
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
23–36
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
2.3 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
1.29×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
11
OREB
23
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
7
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
35%
eFG%
10%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.