ORtg
77.4
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Power Forward · MAD · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
186 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 APGCreation · 80th event percentile
5.8 RPGRebounding · 79th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #48 of 138 · Established
HESI
66.4
Event performance
66th event percentile
PI
64.6
Prospect index
66th event percentile
ORtg
77.4
Points / 100 poss.
55th event percentile
DRtg
71.7
Lower is better
67th event percentile
NRtg
+5.7
Two-way margin
64th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 77.4 · 55th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 71.7 · Stop% 69.7% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
6 games · 151 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Rebounding
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
66.4
66th event percentile
Prospect index
64.6
66th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
77.4
55th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
71.7
67th event percentile
Two-way margin
+5.7
64th event percentile
Stop percentage
69.7%
76th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
6.0 PPG
58th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
5.8 RPG
79th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
71st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.6% TS
40th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 66th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.4 ORtg and 71.7 DRtg, producing a +5.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and defensive stops.
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
5.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
69.7% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
77.4
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
6.0 PPG
58th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.6%
40th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.7%
50th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.5%
37th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
21.9%
context5.3 attempts per game
Free throws
42.9%
32nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
32.8%
47th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
71.7
67th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.8
74th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
69.7%
76th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
71st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
41.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+5.7
64th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.6
66th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
66.4
66th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
64.6
66th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.5%
66th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.8 RPG
79th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
151.2
context25.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#48
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.0
PPG
5.8
RPG
2.0
APG
#48
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#9
RANK
33
FIELD
75%
PERCENTILE
6.3
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.0
PPG
5.8
RPG
2.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
4
GP
6.3
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#48
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.3
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
1.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
47%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #48
//quick_read
6.0
PPG
5.8
RPG
2.0
APG
1.5
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.0
P58
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
5.8
P79
True shooting
35%
P40
Two-way impact
+5.7
P64
Stops
70%
P76
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
27%
13 made / 49 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
7 made / 32 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
3 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
65% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
36
PTS
6.0 / game
13–49
FGM–FGA
7–32
3PM–3PA
3–7
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
1.33×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.8 / game
9
OREB
26
DREB
5.8
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
16
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
66.4
HESI
64.6
PI
77.4
ORtg
71.7
DRtg
+5.7
NRtg
+2.6
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
6%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
+1.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
6.3
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.3
P65
Playmaking
3.0
P94
Rebounding
3.3
P50
True shooting
47%
P53
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
10 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
6.3 / game
10–25
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
3.0 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
3.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
5
OREB
8
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
5
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
46%
eFG%
5%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.