ORtg
78.4
58th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Thesbon Matazaky Raolompanatena
Center · MAD · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
202 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
6.7 RPGRebounding · 84th event percentile
45.3% TSScoring efficiency · 76th event percentile
- 67.2
- HESI v2.1
- #47
- of 138
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #47 of 138 · Established
HESI
67.2
Event performance
67th event percentile
PI
65.2
Prospect index
66th event percentile
ORtg
78.4
Points / 100 poss.
58th event percentile
DRtg
72.4
Lower is better
63rd event percentile
NRtg
+6.0
Two-way margin
65th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 78.4 · 58th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 72.4 · Stop% 67.9% · Team DRtg 73.5
Sample context
6 games · 144 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.7 RPG84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.3% TS76th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
67.2
67th event percentile
Prospect index
65.2
66th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
78.4
58th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
72.4
63rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+6.0
65th event percentile
Stop percentage
67.9%
71st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.5 PPG
65th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
22nd event percentile
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
84th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.3% TS
76th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 67th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 78.4 ORtg and 72.4 DRtg, producing a +6.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring efficiency, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is creation.
Relative strengths
- 84th event percentile
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 76th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.3% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 71st event percentile
Defensive stops
67.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 22nd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.5 PPG
65th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.3%
76th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.5%
63rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.1%
69th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
14.3%
context1.2 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
84th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.1%
66th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
22nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
72.4
63rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
73.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.1
68th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
67.9%
71st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
38.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+6.0
65th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.7
67th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
67.2
67th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
65.2
66th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.8%
80th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.7 RPG
84th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
144.0
context24.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#47
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
473.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.5
PPG
6.7
RPG
0.3
APG
#47
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#2
RANK
33
FIELD
97%
PERCENTILE
12.3
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#47/138Event board →
6
GP
6.5
PPG
6.7
RPG
0.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6
Regional · 2026
#2/33Event board →
4
GP
12.3
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #46Victor Endurance SundayNigeriarank_below · #48Havanirina Theidy RavelosonPF · Madagascar
//current_rank
#47
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#45
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 6 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
12.3
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
74%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #47
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
6.7
RPG
0.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P65
Playmaking
0.3
P22
Rebounding
6.7
P84
True shooting
45%
P76
Two-way impact
+6.0
P65
Stops
68%
P71
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
13 made / 36 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
1 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
12 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
19% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
39
PTS
6.5 / game
13–36
FGM–FGA
1–7
3PM–3PA
12–16
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.14×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
40
REB
6.7 / game
11
OREB
29
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
5
BLK
0.8 / game
10
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
67.2
HESI
65.2
PI
78.4
ORtg
72.4
DRtg
+6.0
NRtg
+2.7
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
9%
PIE
73.5
Team DRtg
+1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 62026
4 GP · event rank #2
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.3
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
74%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.3
P95
Playmaking
0.5
P38
Rebounding
7.8
P91
True shooting
74%
P98
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
72%
18 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
●2PA 24●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
49
PTS
12.3 / game
18–25
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
31
REB
7.8 / game
9
OREB
22
DREB
7.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
72%
eFG%
9%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.