Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Ahmed Yassine M'Rabet

Small Forward · TUN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

198 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

44.2% TSScoring efficiency · 71st event percentile

1.3 APGCreation · 63rd event percentile

67.9
HESI v2.1: #45
of 138: 61%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #45 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

67.9

Event performance

68th event percentile

65.8

Prospect index

68th event percentile

ORtg

87.0

Points / 100 poss.

76th event percentile

DRtg

78.7

Lower is better

46th event percentile

NRtg

+8.3

Two-way margin

66th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 87.0 · 76th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.7 · Stop% 50.4% · Team DRtg 72.7

Sample context

6 games · 94 minutes · 61% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

44.2% TS71st event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG63rd event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

67.9

68th event percentile

Prospect index

65.8

68th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

87.0

76th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.7

46th event percentile

Two-way margin

+8.3

66th event percentile

Stop percentage

50.4%

18th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.5 PPG

38th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

63rd event percentile

Rebounding

1.2 RPG

13th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks

36th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.2% TS

71st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 68th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 87.0 ORtg and 78.7 DRtg, producing a +8.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Offensive efficiency
87.0 ORtg
76th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS
71st event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Two-way margin
+8.3 NRtg
66th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Rebounding
1.2 RPG
13th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive stops
50.4% Stop%
18th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive activity
0.8 steals + blocks/G
36th event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

87.0

76th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.5 PPG

38th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

44.2%

71st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

45.5%

79th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

36.4%

71st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

26.7%

context

2.5 attempts per game

Free throws

25.0%

10th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.6%

59th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

63rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.7

46th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-6.0

18th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

50.4%

18th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.8 STL+BLK

36th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

18.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+8.3

66th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+3.0

68th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

67.9

68th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

65.8

68th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.0%

36th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.2 RPG

13th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

93.7

context

15.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

61.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#45

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

476.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.5

PPG

1.2

RPG

1.3

APG

#45

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

RANK

FIELD

88%

PERCENTILE

7.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#45/138Event board →

3.5

PPG

1.2

RPG

1.3

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#5/34Event board →

7.8

PPG

3.3

RPG

2.5

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #44Sambala Mady Issa SissokoC · Mali

//current_rank

#45

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #46Victor Endurance SundayNigeria

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#43
Daryl BAYA
Forward · Cameroon
9.2 PPG 7.2 RPG 2.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7.8

PPG

3.3

RPG

2.5

APG

1.3

SPG

0.3

BPG

—

3P%

53%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #45

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.5

PPG

1.2

RPG

1.3

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

44%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.5

P38

Playmaking

1.3

P63

Rebounding

1.2

P13

True shooting

44%

P71

Two-way impact

+8.3

P66

Stops

50%

P18

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

36%

8 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

27%

4 made / 15 attempts

Free throws

25%

1 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

68% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.5 / game

8–22

FGM–FGA

4–15

3PM–3PA

1–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.3 / game

TOV

0.8 / game

1.60×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.2 / game

OREB

DREB

1.2

REB/G

defense

STL

0.8 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

67.9

HESI

65.8

87.0

ORtg

78.7

DRtg

+8.3

NRtg

+3.0

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

46%

eFG%

PIE

72.7

Team DRtg

-6.0

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #5

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.8

PPG

3.3

RPG

2.5

APG

1.8

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.8

P78

Playmaking

2.5

P78

Rebounding

3.3

P49

True shooting

53%

P90

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

40%

10 made / 25 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

4 made / 16 attempts

Free throws

70%

7 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

64% of attempts from three

●2PA 9●3PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.8 / game

10–25

FGM–FGA

4–16

3PM–3PA

7–10

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.5 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

1.43×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

3.3 / game

OREB

DREB

3.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

48%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.