ORtg
84.8
72nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Victor Endurance Sunday
NGR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator5.2 APG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer15.8 PPG · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder8.2 RPG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity8.2 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/G · 83rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
5.2 APGCreation · 97th event percentile
15.8 PPGScoring load · 96th event percentile
- 65.7
- HESI v2.1
- #46
- of 138
- 74%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #46 of 138 · Established
HESI
65.7
Event performance
66th event percentile
PI
65.3
Prospect index
67th event percentile
ORtg
84.8
Points / 100 poss.
72nd event percentile
DRtg
80.0
Lower is better
45th event percentile
NRtg
+4.8
Two-way margin
63rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 84.8 · 72nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 80.0 · Stop% 65.5% · Team DRtg 81.6
Sample context
5 games · 172 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
5.2 APG97th event percentile
Scoring load
15.8 PPG96th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
65.7
66th event percentile
Prospect index
65.3
67th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
84.8
72nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.0
45th event percentile
Two-way margin
+4.8
63rd event percentile
Stop percentage
65.5%
65th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
15.8 PPG
96th event percentile
Creation
5.2 APG
97th event percentile
Rebounding
8.2 RPG
94th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.8 stocks
77th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.4% TS
67th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Creator
5.2 APG · 97th event percentile
- P96
Scorer
15.8 PPG · 96th event percentile
- P94
Rebounder
8.2 RPG · 94th event percentile
- P83
Activity
8.2 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/G · 83rd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 66th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.8 ORtg and 80.0 DRtg, producing a +4.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Creation
5.2 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 96th event percentile
Scoring load
15.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 94th event percentile
Rebounding
8.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
15.8 PPG
96th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
42.4%
67th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
31.5%
43rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.1%
50th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context2.4 attempts per game
Free throws
71.7%
81st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
41.3%
78th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.2 APG
97th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
80.0
45th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.5
72nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.5%
65th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.8 STL+BLK
77th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
49.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+4.8
63rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+2.2
66th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
65.7
66th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
65.3
67th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.7%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.2 RPG
94th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
172.4
context34.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#46
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
435.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
15.8
PPG
8.2
RPG
5.2
APG
#46
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#4
RANK
33
FIELD
91%
PERCENTILE
12.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#46/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
15.8
PPG
8.2
RPG
5.2
APG
5.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
15.8
P96
Playmaking
5.2
P97
Rebounding
8.2
P94
True shooting
42%
P67
Two-way impact
+4.8
P63
Stops
66%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
22 made / 73 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
33 made / 46 attempts
Shot selection
16% of attempts from three
●2PA 61●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
79
PTS
15.8 / game
22–73
FGM–FGA
2–12
3PM–3PA
33–46
FTM–FTA
creation
26
AST
5.2 / game
27
TOV
5.4 / game
0.96×
AST:TOV
36
FD
rebounding
41
REB
8.2 / game
13
OREB
28
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.6 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
12
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
65.7
HESI
65.3
PI
84.8
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
+4.8
NRtg
+2.2
Stable NRtg
66%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
12%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#4/33view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.0
PPG
5.5
RPG
6.0
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.0
P83
Playmaking
6.0
P95
Rebounding
5.5
P71
True shooting
46%
P71
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
18 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
8%
1 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
11 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 34●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
12.0 / game
18–46
FGM–FGA
1–12
3PM–3PA
11–14
FTM–FTA
creation
24
AST
6.0 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
3.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
22
REB
5.5 / game
7
OREB
15
DREB
5.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
6
PF
12
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
11%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #45Ahmed Yassine M'RabetSF · Tunisiarank_below · #47Thesbon Matazaky RaolompanatenaC · Madagascar
//current_rank
#46
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#44
#45
#47
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
12.0
PPG
5.5
RPG
6.0
APG
2.5
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #46
//quick_read
The line at a glance
15.8
PPG
8.2
RPG
5.2
APG
5.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
15.8
P96
Playmaking
5.2
P97
Rebounding
8.2
P94
True shooting
42%
P67
Two-way impact
+4.8
P63
Stops
66%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
22 made / 73 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
33 made / 46 attempts
Shot selection
16% of attempts from three
●2PA 61●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
79
PTS
15.8 / game
22–73
FGM–FGA
2–12
3PM–3PA
33–46
FTM–FTA
creation
26
AST
5.2 / game
27
TOV
5.4 / game
0.96×
AST:TOV
36
FD
rebounding
41
REB
8.2 / game
13
OREB
28
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.6 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
12
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
65.7
HESI
65.3
PI
84.8
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
+4.8
NRtg
+2.2
Stable NRtg
66%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
12%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
+1.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026
4 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.0
PPG
5.5
RPG
6.0
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.0
P83
Playmaking
6.0
P95
Rebounding
5.5
P71
True shooting
46%
P71
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
18 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
8%
1 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
11 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 34●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
12.0 / game
18–46
FGM–FGA
1–12
3PM–3PA
11–14
FTM–FTA
creation
24
AST
6.0 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
3.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
22
REB
5.5 / game
7
OREB
15
DREB
5.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
6
PF
12
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
11%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.