ORtg
72.5
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Daryl BAYA
Forward · CMR · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
197 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
7.2 RPGRebounding · 87th event percentile
2.7 stocksDefensive activity · 84th event percentile
- 70.1
- HESI v2.1
- #43
- of 138
- 73%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #43 of 138 · Established
HESI
70.1
Event performance
70th event percentile
PI
67.6
Prospect index
69th event percentile
ORtg
72.5
Points / 100 poss.
45th event percentile
DRtg
63.6
Lower is better
85th event percentile
NRtg
+8.9
Two-way margin
68th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 72.5 · 45th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.6 · Stop% 74.3% · Team DRtg 65.9
Sample context
6 games · 164 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
7.2 RPG87th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 stocks84th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
70.1
70th event percentile
Prospect index
67.6
69th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
72.5
45th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.6
85th event percentile
Two-way margin
+8.9
68th event percentile
Stop percentage
74.3%
84th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.2 PPG
78th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
7.2 RPG
87th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 stocks
84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.5% TS
54th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P92
Rim Protection
1.2 BPG · 92nd event percentile
- P87
Rebounder
7.2 RPG · 87th event percentile
- P85
Activity
7.2 RPG + 2.7 defensive plays/G · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 70th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 72.5 ORtg and 63.6 DRtg, producing a +8.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 87th event percentile
Rebounding
7.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 85th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.6 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 84th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.2 PPG
78th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.5%
54th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.7%
61st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
34.4%
64th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
15.8%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
38.1%
25th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
35.3%
55th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.6
85th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
65.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.3
76th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
74.3%
84th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.7 STL+BLK
84th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
50.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+8.9
68th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.1
70th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
70.1
70th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.6
69th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.5%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.2 RPG
87th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
163.8
context27.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#43
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-22 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-22
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. Best current separators: Post defense. Primary pressure points: Offensive rebounding, Shooting utility, Screening.
Now · ForwardProjects · Forward
Translatable strengths
- · Post defense
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Offensive rebounding
- · Shooting utility
- · Screening
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Projects as a back-line defender in coverages that keep her near the rim. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
Extended space assignments that consistently pull her away from the paint.
Development priorities
Offensive rebounding · Shooting utility
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
LM D1
Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive70.1 performance rating · rank 43 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 72.5 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive35.3% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive74.3% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.0
APG
#43
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#43/138Event board →
6
GP
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #42Médard DabiréC · Côte d'Ivoirerank_below · #44Sambala Mady Issa SissokoC · Mali
//current_rank
#43
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#41
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.0
APG
1.5
SPG
1.2
BPG
16%
3P%
38%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #43
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.2
PPG
7.2
RPG
2.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.2
P78
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
7.2
P87
True shooting
38%
P54
Two-way impact
+8.9
P68
Stops
74%
P84
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
34%
22 made / 64 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
16%
3 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
8 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 45●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
55
PTS
9.2 / game
22–64
FGM–FGA
3–19
3PM–3PA
8–21
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
43
REB
7.2 / game
9
OREB
34
DREB
7.2
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.5 / game
7
BLK
1.2 / game
10
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
70.1
HESI
67.6
PI
72.5
ORtg
63.6
DRtg
+8.9
NRtg
+5.1
Stable NRtg
74%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
9%
PIE
65.9
Team DRtg
+2.3
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.