Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Mehdi Berrada

MAR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

17.6 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile

53.3% TSScoring efficiency · 91st event percentile

69.3
HESI v2.1: #41
of 138: 71%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #41 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

69.3

Event performance

69th event percentile

68.2

Prospect index

71st event percentile

ORtg

95.3

Points / 100 poss.

85th event percentile

DRtg

86.4

Lower is better

29th event percentile

NRtg

+8.9

Two-way margin

67th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 95.3 · 85th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 86.4 · Stop% 51.1% · Team DRtg 83.1

Sample context

5 games · 144 minutes · 71% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

17.6 PPG99th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

53.3% TS91st event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

69.3

69th event percentile

Prospect index

68.2

71st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

95.3

85th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

86.4

29th event percentile

Two-way margin

+8.9

67th event percentile

Stop percentage

51.1%

21st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

17.6 PPG

99th event percentile

Creation

1.8 APG

75th event percentile

Rebounding

2.4 RPG

30th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks

55th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

53.3% TS

91st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P99
Scorer
17.6 PPG · 99th event percentile
P91
Event Efficiency
53% TS on 17.6 PPG · 91st event percentile
P85
Offensive Impact
95.3 ORtg · 85th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 69th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 95.3 ORtg and 86.4 DRtg, producing a +8.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

Scoring load
17.6 PPG
99th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
53.3% TS
91st event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
95.3 ORtg
85th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
51.1% Stop%
21st event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
86.4 DRtg
29th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Rebounding
2.4 RPG
30th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

95.3

85th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

17.6 PPG

99th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

53.3%

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

52.5%

94th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

43.0%

85th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

34.9%

context

8.6 attempts per game

Free throws

62.5%

68th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

40.1%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.8 APG

75th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

86.4

29th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

83.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.3

36th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

51.1%

21st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.0 STL+BLK

55th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+8.9

67th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+4.7

69th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

69.3

69th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

68.2

71st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

10.4%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.4 RPG

30th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

144.3

context

28.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

70.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#41

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

412.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

17.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

1.8

APG

#41

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

RANK

131

FIELD

98%

PERCENTILE

21.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#41/138Event board →

17.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

1.8

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

#3/131Event board →

21.0

PPG

4.3

RPG

5.3

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #40Mouhamed BadianeF · Senegal

//current_rank

#41

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #42Médard DabiréC · Côte d'Ivoire

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#39
Papa Ndiack Faye
Forward · Senegal
6.7 PPG 4.8 RPG 1.8 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.

21.0

PPG

4.3

RPG

5.3

APG

3.5

SPG

0.3

BPG

26%

3P%

53%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #41

//quick_read

The line at a glance

17.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

1.8

APG

3.6

TOV/G

3.0

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

17.6

P99

Playmaking

1.8

P75

Rebounding

2.4

P30

True shooting

53%

P91

Two-way impact

+8.9

P67

Stops

51%

P21

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

43%

34 made / 79 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

35%

15 made / 43 attempts

Free throws

63%

5 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

54% of attempts from three

●2PA 36●3PA 43

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

17.6 / game

34–79

FGM–FGA

15–43

3PM–3PA

5–8

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.8 / game

TOV

3.6 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

2.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

69.3

HESI

68.2

95.3

ORtg

86.4

DRtg

+8.9

NRtg

+4.7

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

40%

Floor%

53%

eFG%

10%

PIE

83.1

Team DRtg

-3.3

Def. lift

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

4 GP · event rank #3

//quick_read

The line at a glance

21.0

PPG

4.3

RPG

5.3

APG

4.5

TOV/G

2.3

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

21.0

P100

Playmaking

5.3

P98

Rebounding

4.3

P56

True shooting

53%

P94

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

44%

30 made / 69 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

26%

9 made / 35 attempts

Free throws

68%

15 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

51% of attempts from three

●2PA 34●3PA 35

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

21.0 / game

30–69

FGM–FGA

9–35

3PM–3PA

15–22

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

5.3 / game

TOV

4.5 / game

1.17×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

4.3 / game

OREB

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

STL

3.5 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

3.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

50%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.