ORtg
73.2
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Mouhamed Badiane
Forward · SEN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.5 stocksDefensive activity · 71st event percentile
4.5 RPGRebounding · 63rd event percentile
- 71.5
- HESI v2.1
- #40
- of 138
- 73%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #40 of 138 · Established
HESI
71.5
Event performance
71st event percentile
PI
68.7
Prospect index
71st event percentile
ORtg
73.2
Points / 100 poss.
45th event percentile
DRtg
63.8
Lower is better
84th event percentile
NRtg
+9.5
Two-way margin
68th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 73.2 · 45th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.8 · Stop% 64.6% · Team DRtg 60.6
Sample context
6 games · 160 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks71st event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG63rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
71.5
71st event percentile
Prospect index
68.7
71st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
73.2
45th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.8
84th event percentile
Two-way margin
+9.5
68th event percentile
Stop percentage
64.6%
62nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.2 PPG
61st event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
63rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks
71st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.2% TS
48th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 71st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 73.2 ORtg and 63.8 DRtg, producing a +9.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive activity, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 84th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 71st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 68th event percentile
Two-way margin
+9.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.2 PPG
61st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.2%
48th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.5%
60th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.4%
68th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
7.1%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
28.6%
14th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.4%
58th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.8
84th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
60.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.2
37th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.6%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.5 STL+BLK
71st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
40.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+9.5
68th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.4
71st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
71.5
71st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
68.7
71st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.1%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
63rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
160.0
context26.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#40
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
470.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-24 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-24
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Offensive rebounding, Gap help, Rim protection.
Now · ForwardProjects · Forward
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Offensive rebounding
- · Gap help
- · Rim protection
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 1.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Offensive rebounding · Gap help
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive71.5 performance rating · rank 40 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 73.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive36.4% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive64.6% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.0
APG
#40
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#40/138Event board →
6
GP
6.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #39Papa Ndiack FayeF · Senegalrank_below · #41Mehdi BerradaMorocco
//current_rank
#40
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#38
Nigeria
10.6 PPG 3.6 RPG 1.8 APG
//event_signalShooter36% 3PT on 5.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
6.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.0
APG
2.3
SPG
0.2
BPG
7%
3P%
36%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #40
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.2
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.0
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.2
P61
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
4.5
P63
True shooting
36%
P48
Two-way impact
+9.5
P68
Stops
65%
P62
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
17 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
1 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
●2PA 34●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
6.2 / game
17–48
FGM–FGA
1–14
3PM–3PA
2–7
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
0.60×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
13
OREB
14
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
11
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
71.5
HESI
68.7
PI
73.2
ORtg
63.8
DRtg
+9.5
NRtg
+5.4
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
7%
PIE
60.6
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.