ORtg
98.3
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Olakunle Aribo
NGR · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
55.0% TSScoring efficiency · 95th event percentile
10.6 PPGScoring load · 85th event percentile
- 72.3
- HESI v2.1
- #38
- of 138
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #38 of 138 · Established
HESI
72.3
Event performance
72nd event percentile
PI
70.5
Prospect index
73rd event percentile
ORtg
98.3
Points / 100 poss.
89th event percentile
DRtg
86.2
Lower is better
29th event percentile
NRtg
+12.1
Two-way margin
71st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 98.3 · 89th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 86.2 · Stop% 51.2% · Team DRtg 81.6
Sample context
5 games · 111 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
55.0% TS95th event percentile
Scoring load
10.6 PPG85th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
72.3
72nd event percentile
Prospect index
70.5
73rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
98.3
89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.2
29th event percentile
Two-way margin
+12.1
71st event percentile
Stop percentage
51.2%
22nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.6 PPG
85th event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG
75th event percentile
Rebounding
3.6 RPG
50th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
55th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.0% TS
95th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Event Efficiency
55% TS on 10.6 PPG · 95th event percentile
- P89
Offensive Impact
98.3 ORtg · 89th event percentile
Shooter
36% 3PT on 5.0 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 72nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 98.3 ORtg and 86.2 DRtg, producing a +12.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.0% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 89th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
98.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 85th event percentile
Scoring load
10.6 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 22nd event percentile
Defensive stops
51.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 29th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.2 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.6 PPG
85th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
55.0%
95th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
51.2%
92nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.5%
80th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
36.0%
context5.0 attempts per game
Free throws
71.4%
79th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
41.8%
79th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.8 APG
75th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
86.2
29th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.6
29th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
51.2%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
55th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+12.1
71st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+6.0
72nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
72.3
72nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
70.5
73rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.2%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.6 RPG
50th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
110.7
context22.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#38
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
435.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
10.6
PPG
3.6
RPG
1.8
APG
#38
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#38/138Event board →
5
GP
10.6
PPG
3.6
RPG
1.8
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#18/33Event board →
4
GP
5.5
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #37Siincere Fashione HudsonPG · Côte d'Ivoirerank_below · #39Papa Ndiack FayeF · Senegal
//current_rank
#38
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#36
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
10.6
PPG
3.6
RPG
1.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
36%
3P%
55%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #38
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.6
PPG
3.6
RPG
1.8
APG
2.6
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.6
P85
Playmaking
1.8
P75
Rebounding
3.6
P50
True shooting
55%
P95
Two-way impact
+12.1
P71
Stops
51%
P22
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
41%
17 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
9 made / 25 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
10 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 25
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
53
PTS
10.6 / game
17–42
FGM–FGA
9–25
3PM–3PA
10–14
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
13
TOV
2.6 / game
0.69×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
18
REB
3.6 / game
4
OREB
14
DREB
3.6
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
9
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
72.3
HESI
70.5
PI
98.3
ORtg
86.2
DRtg
+12.1
NRtg
+6.0
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
51%
eFG%
7%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
-4.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026
4 GP · event rank #18
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.5
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.5
P56
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
1.8
P20
True shooting
40%
P50
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
9 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
21%
3 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
54% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
5.5 / game
9–26
FGM–FGA
3–14
3PM–3PA
1–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.43×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.8 / game
2
OREB
5
DREB
1.8
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.