ORtg
82.1
68th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Joachim Barthelemy Basson
Combo Guard · CMR · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
198 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
46.4% TSScoring efficiency · 77th event percentile
1.6 APGCreation · 71st event percentile
- 75.2
- HESI v2.1
- #36
- of 138
- 59%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #36 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
75.2
Event performance
75th event percentile
PI
71.6
Prospect index
74th event percentile
ORtg
82.1
Points / 100 poss.
68th event percentile
DRtg
65.1
Lower is better
82nd event percentile
NRtg
+17.0
Two-way margin
78th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 82.1 · 68th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 65.1 · Stop% 70.9% · Team DRtg 65.9
Sample context
5 games · 86 minutes · 59% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS77th event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG71st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
75.2
75th event percentile
Prospect index
71.6
74th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
82.1
68th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
65.1
82nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+17.0
78th event percentile
Stop percentage
70.9%
79th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.6 PPG
54th event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG
71st event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.6 stocks
67th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS
77th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 75th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.1 ORtg and 65.1 DRtg, producing a +17.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 82nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
65.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 79th event percentile
Defensive stops
70.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 78th event percentile
Two-way margin
+17.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 40th event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.6 PPG
54th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.4%
77th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.9%
73rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.1%
61st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context3.6 attempts per game
Free throws
80.0%
90th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
32.6%
45th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.6 APG
71st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
65.1
82nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
65.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.8
66th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.9%
79th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.6 STL+BLK
67th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+17.0
78th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+7.8
75th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
75.2
75th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
71.6
74th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.6%
46th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.0 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
85.6
context17.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
58.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#36
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Ivory Coast U18 · 2026-09-23 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-23
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
lead_guard · combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector
lead_guard · combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Gap help, Ball-screen creation, Advantage extension.
Now · Lead GuardNow · Combo GuardProjects · Lead GuardProjects · Combo Guard
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Gap help
- · Ball-screen creation
- · Advantage extension
Offensive translation
Can take on more on-ball creator responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 1; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Gap help · Ball-screen creation
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive75.2 performance rating · rank 36 · 5 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 82.1 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive32.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive70.9% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Complete at least eight applicable trait observations
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.6
APG
#36
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#36/138Event board →
5
GP
5.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.6
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #35Abderahmen BouguerraTunisiarank_below · #37Siincere Fashione HudsonPG · Côte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#36
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#34
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
5.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.6
APG
1.0
SPG
0.6
BPG
33%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #36
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.6
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.6
P54
Playmaking
1.6
P71
Rebounding
3.0
P40
True shooting
46%
P77
Two-way impact
+17.0
P78
Stops
71%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
9 made / 28 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
6 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
4 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
64% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
28
PTS
5.6 / game
9–28
FGM–FGA
6–18
3PM–3PA
4–5
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.6 / game
10
TOV
2.0 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.0 / game
2
OREB
13
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
17
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
75.2
HESI
71.6
PI
82.1
ORtg
65.1
DRtg
+17.0
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
3%
PIE
65.9
Team DRtg
+0.8
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.