ORtg
104.2
95th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Zeineldin Ahmed Aly Mohamed Aly Abdeldaim
EGY · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
2 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact104.2 ORtg · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
- 2
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Clipvs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-10 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip- Clipvs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-10 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-10
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #34 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
75.9
Event performance
76th event percentile
PI
72.2
Prospect index
76th event percentile
ORtg
104.2
Points / 100 poss.
95th event percentile
DRtg
87.9
Lower is better
24th event percentile
NRtg
+16.4
Two-way margin
77th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 104.2 · 95th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 87.9 · Stop% 54.5% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
6 games · 92 minutes · 61% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
48.1% TS81st event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG51st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
75.9
76th event percentile
Prospect index
72.2
76th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.2
95th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.9
24th event percentile
Two-way margin
+16.4
77th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.5%
32nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
42nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
37th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
28th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.1% TS
81st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Offensive Impact
104.2 ORtg · 95th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.2 ORtg and 87.9 DRtg, producing a +16.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive activity, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Two-way margin
+16.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.9 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 28th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 32nd event percentile
Defensive stops
54.5% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
42nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
48.1%
81st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.5%
70th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.1%
76th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
77.8%
89th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
49.2%
94th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
87.9
24th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.3
45th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.5%
32nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
28th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
20.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+16.4
77th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+7.8
76th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
75.9
76th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
72.2
76th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.1%
74th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
37th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
92.3
context15.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#34
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.0
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.0
APG
#34
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#9
RANK
70
FIELD
88%
PERCENTILE
9.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#34/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.0
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P42
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
2.8
P37
True shooting
48%
P81
Two-way impact
+16.4
P77
Stops
54%
P32
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
8 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–21
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
3
TOV
0.5 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
17
REB
2.8 / game
2
OREB
15
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
75.9
HESI
72.2
PI
104.2
ORtg
87.9
DRtg
+16.4
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
49%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
5%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#9/70view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.5
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.8
P81
Playmaking
2.5
P78
Rebounding
4.0
P57
True shooting
53%
P88
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
16 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
4 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
39
PTS
9.8 / game
16–33
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
4–8
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.5 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
3
OREB
13
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53%
eFG%
5%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #33Mamadou Niama SissokoG · Malirank_below · #35Abderahmen BouguerraTunisia
//current_rank
#34
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#32
#33
#35
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
9.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.5
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
53%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #34
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.0
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P42
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
2.8
P37
True shooting
48%
P81
Two-way impact
+16.4
P77
Stops
54%
P32
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
8 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 6
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
24
PTS
4.0 / game
8–21
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
3
TOV
0.5 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
17
REB
2.8 / game
2
OREB
15
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
75.9
HESI
72.2
PI
104.2
ORtg
87.9
DRtg
+16.4
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
49%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
5%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.5
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.8
P81
Playmaking
2.5
P78
Rebounding
4.0
P57
True shooting
53%
P88
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
16 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
4 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
39
PTS
9.8 / game
16–33
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
4–8
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.5 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
3
OREB
13
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53%
eFG%
5%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.