Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Mahamadou Sylla

MLI · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

5.2 RPGRebounding · 71st event percentile

2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 70th event percentile

78.1
HESI v2.1: #32
of 138: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

1 public video

Available for visual validation

Scouting

Final report on file

Human evaluation is clearly labeled

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #32 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

78.1

Event performance

78th event percentile

74.0

Prospect index

77th event percentile

ORtg

74.3

Points / 100 poss.

47th event percentile

DRtg

59.7

Lower is better

95th event percentile

NRtg

+14.5

Two-way margin

75th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 74.3 · 47th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 59.7 · Stop% 77.1% · Team DRtg 62.7

Sample context

6 games · 133 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

5.2 RPG71st event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks70th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

78.1

78th event percentile

Prospect index

74.0

77th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

74.3

47th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

59.7

95th event percentile

Two-way margin

+14.5

75th event percentile

Stop percentage

77.1%

89th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.7 PPG

39th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Rebounding

5.2 RPG

71st event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

70th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

36.8% TS

51st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P92
Defensive Impact
59.7 DRtg · 77% Stop% · 92nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 78th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.3 ORtg and 59.7 DRtg, producing a +14.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is scoring load.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
59.7 DRtg
95th event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
77.1% Stop%
89th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
+14.5 NRtg
75th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring load
3.7 PPG
39th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

74.3

47th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.7 PPG

39th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

36.8%

51st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

36.2%

58th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

31.0%

55th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

25.0%

context

2.0 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

45th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

32.8%

46th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

59.7

95th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+2.9

82nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

77.1%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

70th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

42.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+14.5

75th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+8.3

78th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

78.1

78th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

74.0

77th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.2%

70th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.2 RPG

71st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

132.6

context

22.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

68.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#32

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

493.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Tunisia U18 · 2026-09-25 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-25

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker

forward · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Offensive rebounding, Gap help, Rim protection.

Now · ForwardProjects · Forward

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

· Offensive rebounding
· Gap help
· Rim protection

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher.

Defensive assignments

primary gap / nail helper (grade 1.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Offensive rebounding · Gap help

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

Limited representative evidence attached

pathway_hypothesis

NCAA D2

NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

78.1 performance rating · rank 32 · 6 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 74.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

32.8% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

77.1% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Limited representative evidence attached

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.7

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.0

APG

#32

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#32/138Event board →

3.7

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #31Ekene UnekweNigeria

//current_rank

#32

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #33Mamadou Niama SissokoG · Mali

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#30
Aboubacar Sidiki Konate
Mali
4.8 PPG 1.7 RPG 1.2 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.7

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.0

APG

2.2

SPG

0.2

BPG

25%

3P%

37%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #32

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

5.2

RPG

1.0

APG

1.5

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P39

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

5.2

P71

True shooting

37%

P51

Two-way impact

+14.5

P75

Stops

77%

P89

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

31%

9 made / 29 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

3 made / 12 attempts

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.7 / game

9–29

FGM–FGA

3–12

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

1.5 / game

0.67×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

5.2 / game

OREB

DREB

5.2

REB/G

defense

STL

2.2 / game

BLK

0.2 / game

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

78.1

HESI

74.0

74.3

ORtg

59.7

DRtg

+14.5

NRtg

+8.3

Stable NRtg

77%

Stop%

33%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

PIE

62.7

Team DRtg

+2.9

Def. lift

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.