ORtg
93.1
83rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Aboubacar Sidiki Konate
MLI · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.2 APGCreation · 58th event percentile
4.8 PPGScoring load · 48th event percentile
- 78.8
- HESI v2.1
- #30
- of 138
- 52%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #30 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
78.8
Event performance
79th event percentile
PI
74.6
Prospect index
79th event percentile
ORtg
93.1
Points / 100 poss.
83rd event percentile
DRtg
70.7
Lower is better
71st event percentile
NRtg
+22.4
Two-way margin
85th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 93.1 · 83rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 70.7 · Stop% 51.0% · Team DRtg 62.7
Sample context
6 games · 66 minutes · 52% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
1.2 APG58th event percentile
Scoring load
4.8 PPG48th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
78.8
79th event percentile
Prospect index
74.6
79th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.1
83rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
70.7
71st event percentile
Two-way margin
+22.4
85th event percentile
Stop percentage
51.0%
21st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.8 PPG
48th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
33rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.4% TS
44th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 79th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 93.1 ORtg and 70.7 DRtg, producing a +22.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 85th event percentile
Two-way margin
+22.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 83rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 71st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
70.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 21st event percentile
Defensive stops
51.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 23rd event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 33rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.8 PPG
48th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
35.4%
44th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.8%
52nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
29.7%
48th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
44.4%
35th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.4%
84th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
70.7
71st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-8.0
7th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
51.0%
21st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
33rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
13.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+22.4
85th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+9.2
79th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
78.8
79th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
74.6
79th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.0%
40th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
65.5
context10.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
52.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#30
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Cameroon U18 · 2026-09-25 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-25
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Advantage extension, Screen navigation, Gap help.
Now · Off GuardNow · WingProjects · Off GuardProjects · Wing
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Advantage extension
- · Screen navigation
- · Gap help
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 1.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 1.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Advantage extension · Screen navigation
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D3
NCAA Division III hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive78.8 performance rating · rank 30 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 93.1 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive43.4% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive51.0% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.2
APG
#30
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#30/138Event board →
6
GP
4.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.2
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #29Sekou Ousmane BagayokoPG · Malirank_below · #31Ekene UnekweNigeria
//current_rank
#30
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#28
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
4.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.2
APG
0.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
25%
3P%
35%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #30
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.2
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.8
P48
Playmaking
1.2
P58
Rebounding
1.7
P23
True shooting
35%
P44
Two-way impact
+22.4
P85
Stops
51%
P21
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
11 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
3 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
4 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 25●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
29
PTS
4.8 / game
11–37
FGM–FGA
3–12
3PM–3PA
4–9
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
2
TOV
0.3 / game
3.50×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
6
OREB
4
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.8
HESI
74.6
PI
93.1
ORtg
70.7
DRtg
+22.4
NRtg
+9.2
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
2%
PIE
62.7
Team DRtg
-8.0
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.