ORtg
99.7
91st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Ekene Unekwe
NGR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection1.8 BPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder8.4 RPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact99.7 ORtg · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
72.3% TSScoring efficiency · 99th event percentile
8.4 RPGRebounding · 95th event percentile
- 76.6
- HESI v2.1
- #31
- of 138
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #31 of 138 · Established
HESI
76.6
Event performance
76th event percentile
PI
74.0
Prospect index
78th event percentile
ORtg
99.7
Points / 100 poss.
91st event percentile
DRtg
86.0
Lower is better
30th event percentile
NRtg
+13.7
Two-way margin
74th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 99.7 · 91st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 86.0 · Stop% 51.6% · Team DRtg 81.6
Sample context
5 games · 135 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
72.3% TS99th event percentile
Rebounding
8.4 RPG95th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
76.6
76th event percentile
Prospect index
74.0
78th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.7
91st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.0
30th event percentile
Two-way margin
+13.7
74th event percentile
Stop percentage
51.6%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
70th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
61st event percentile
Rebounding
8.4 RPG
95th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
72.3% TS
99th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Rim Protection
1.8 BPG · 97th event percentile
- P95
Rebounder
8.4 RPG · 95th event percentile
- P91
Offensive Impact
99.7 ORtg · 91st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 99.7 ORtg and 86.0 DRtg, producing a +13.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, rebounding, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
72.3% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 95th event percentile
Rebounding
8.4 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Defensive stops
51.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 30th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.0 PPG
70th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
72.3%
99th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
68.2%
99th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
68.2%
99th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
100.0%
98th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.8%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
61st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
86.0
30th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.5
31st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
51.6%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
57th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
30.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+13.7
74th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+7.8
76th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
76.6
76th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
74.0
78th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
10.5%
91st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.4 RPG
95th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
135.4
context27.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#31
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
435.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
7.0
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.2
APG
#31
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#5
RANK
33
FIELD
88%
PERCENTILE
10.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#31/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.2
APG
2.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
72%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P70
Playmaking
1.2
P61
Rebounding
8.4
P95
True shooting
72%
P100
Two-way impact
+13.7
P74
Stops
52%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
68%
15 made / 22 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
5 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
35
PTS
7.0 / game
15–22
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–5
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.2 / game
14
TOV
2.8 / game
0.43×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
42
REB
8.4 / game
23
OREB
19
DREB
8.4
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
9
BLK
1.8 / game
11
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
76.6
HESI
74.0
PI
99.7
ORtg
86.0
DRtg
+13.7
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
68%
eFG%
10%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
-4.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#5/33view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.0
PPG
10.0
RPG
0.8
APG
4.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.0
P71
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
10.0
P98
True shooting
61%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
61%
19 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 31●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
40
PTS
10.0 / game
19–31
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
16
TOV
4.0 / game
0.19×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
40
REB
10.0 / game
21
OREB
19
DREB
10.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
11
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
61%
eFG%
7%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #30Aboubacar Sidiki KonateMalirank_below · #32Mahamadou SyllaMali
//current_rank
#31
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#29
#30
#32
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
10.0
PPG
10.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
61%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #31
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.2
APG
2.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
72%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P70
Playmaking
1.2
P61
Rebounding
8.4
P95
True shooting
72%
P100
Two-way impact
+13.7
P74
Stops
52%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
68%
15 made / 22 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
5 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
35
PTS
7.0 / game
15–22
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–5
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.2 / game
14
TOV
2.8 / game
0.43×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
42
REB
8.4 / game
23
OREB
19
DREB
8.4
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
9
BLK
1.8 / game
11
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
76.6
HESI
74.0
PI
99.7
ORtg
86.0
DRtg
+13.7
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
68%
eFG%
10%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
-4.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026
4 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.0
PPG
10.0
RPG
0.8
APG
4.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.0
P71
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
10.0
P98
True shooting
61%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
61%
19 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 31●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
40
PTS
10.0 / game
19–31
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
16
TOV
4.0 / game
0.19×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
40
REB
10.0 / game
21
OREB
19
DREB
10.0
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
11
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
61%
eFG%
7%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.