ORtg
80.8
63rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Oolakunle David Kayode
NGR · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
5.2 RPGRebounding · 72nd event percentile
30.4% TSScoring efficiency · 31st event percentile
- 59.1
- HESI v2.1
- #56
- of 138
- 49%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #56 of 138 · Limited sample
HESI
59.1
Event performance
59th event percentile
PI
60.0
Prospect index
60th event percentile
ORtg
80.8
Points / 100 poss.
63rd event percentile
DRtg
76.8
Lower is better
54th event percentile
NRtg
+4.0
Two-way margin
61st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 80.8 · 63rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 76.8 · Stop% 73.2% · Team DRtg 81.6
Sample context
5 games · 58 minutes · 49% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
5.2 RPG72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
30.4% TS31st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
59.1
59th event percentile
Prospect index
60.0
60th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
80.8
63rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.8
54th event percentile
Two-way margin
+4.0
61st event percentile
Stop percentage
73.2%
82nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
26th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
26th event percentile
Rebounding
5.2 RPG
72nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
31st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
30.4% TS
31st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 59th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 80.8 ORtg and 76.8 DRtg, producing a +4.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, creation, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 82nd event percentile
Defensive stops
73.2% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 72nd event percentile
Rebounding
5.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 26th event percentile
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 26th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 31st event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.0 PPG
26th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
30.4%
31st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
31.3%
42nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.3%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
0.0%
3rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.7%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.4 APG
26th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
76.8
54th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.8
87th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
73.2%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
31st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
18.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+4.0
61st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-0.7
59th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
59.1
59th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
60.0
60th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.0%
56th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.2 RPG
72nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
58.4
context11.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
49.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#56
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
435.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.0
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.4
APG
#56
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#12
RANK
33
FIELD
66%
PERCENTILE
3.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#56/138Event board →
5
GP
2.0
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.4
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#12/33Event board →
4
GP
3.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #55Ouwa CamaraPG · Malirank_below · #57Pape Moussa DialloPG · Senegal
//current_rank
#56
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#54
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
3.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.3
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
50%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #56
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
5.2
RPG
0.4
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
30%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P26
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
5.2
P72
True shooting
30%
P31
Two-way impact
+4.0
P61
Stops
73%
P82
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
5 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
2.0 / game
5–16
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
26
REB
5.2 / game
10
OREB
16
DREB
5.2
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
59.1
HESI
60.0
PI
80.8
ORtg
76.8
DRtg
+4.0
NRtg
-0.7
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
31%
eFG%
4%
PIE
81.6
Team DRtg
+4.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 32026
4 GP · event rank #12
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.3
APG
0.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.5
P41
Playmaking
0.3
P15
Rebounding
3.8
P50
True shooting
50%
P83
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
54%
7 made / 13 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 13●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
14
PTS
3.5 / game
7–13
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
2
TOV
0.5 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
54%
eFG%
4%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.