Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Plamedie BIZIMANA KAYIRA

Small Forward · RWA · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

196 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

8.8 RPGRebounding · 96th event percentile

15.0 PPGScoring load · 95th event percentile

53.3
HESI v2.1: #67
of 138: 71%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #67 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

53.3

Event performance

53rd event percentile

54.1

Prospect index

52nd event percentile

ORtg

82.7

Points / 100 poss.

69th event percentile

DRtg

85.3

Lower is better

32nd event percentile

NRtg

-2.6

Two-way margin

53rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 82.7 · 69th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 85.3 · Stop% 66.6% · Team DRtg 88.4

Sample context

5 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

8.8 RPG96th event percentile

Scoring load

15.0 PPG95th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

53.3

53rd event percentile

Prospect index

54.1

52nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

82.7

69th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

85.3

32nd event percentile

Two-way margin

-2.6

53rd event percentile

Stop percentage

66.6%

69th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

15.0 PPG

95th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Rebounding

8.8 RPG

96th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.2 stocks

87th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

37.2% TS

53rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P96
Rebounder
8.8 RPG · 96th event percentile
P95
Scorer
15.0 PPG · 95th event percentile
P90
Activity
8.8 RPG + 3.2 defensive plays/G · 90th event percentile
P87
Disruptor
3.2 steals + blocks per game · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 53rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.7 ORtg and 85.3 DRtg, producing a -2.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive activity. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
8.8 RPG
96th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
15.0 PPG
95th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive activity
3.2 steals + blocks/G
87th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
85.3 DRtg
32nd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

82.7

69th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

15.0 PPG

95th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

37.2%

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

31.1%

41st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

26.8%

40th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

19.4%

context

7.2 attempts per game

Free throws

55.8%

58th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

39.8%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

85.3

32nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+3.0

82nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

66.6%

69th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.2 STL+BLK

87th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

41.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-2.6

53rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-3.4

53rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

53.3

53rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

54.1

52nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.6%

66th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

8.8 RPG

96th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

147.0

context

29.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

71.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#67

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

421.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

15.0

PPG

8.8

RPG

1.0

APG

#67

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#14

RANK

FIELD

81%

PERCENTILE

8.5

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#67/138Event board →

15.0

PPG

8.8

RPG

1.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#14/70Event board →

8.5

PPG

12.3

RPG

1.8

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #66Youssef KallelTunisia

//current_rank

#67

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #68Omar MostafaPG · Egypt

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#65
Bayero Aliyou
Cameroon
2.7 PPG 6.2 RPG 0.8 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

8.5

PPG

12.3

RPG

1.8

APG

2.3

SPG

2.0

BPG

—

3P%

37%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #67

//quick_read

The line at a glance

15.0

PPG

8.8

RPG

1.0

APG

2.2

TOV/G

1.4

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

15.0

P95

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

8.8

P96

True shooting

37%

P53

Two-way impact

-2.6

P53

Stops

67%

P69

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

22 made / 82 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

19%

7 made / 36 attempts

Free throws

56%

24 made / 43 attempts

Shot selection

44% of attempts from three

●2PA 46●3PA 36

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

15.0 / game

22–82

FGM–FGA

7–36

3PM–3PA

24–43

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

2.2 / game

0.45×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

8.8 / game

OREB

DREB

8.8

REB/G

defense

STL

2.4 / game

BLK

0.8 / game

STL+BLK

3.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

53.3

HESI

54.1

82.7

ORtg

85.3

DRtg

-2.6

NRtg

-3.4

Stable NRtg

67%

Stop%

40%

Floor%

31%

eFG%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

+3.0

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #14

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.5

PPG

12.3

RPG

1.8

APG

4.3

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.5

P75

Playmaking

1.8

P66

Rebounding

12.3

P98

True shooting

37%

P43

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

32%

13 made / 41 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

11%

1 made / 9 attempts

Free throws

58%

7 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

●2PA 32●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

8.5 / game

13–41

FGM–FGA

1–9

3PM–3PA

7–12

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.8 / game

TOV

4.3 / game

0.41×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

12.3 / game

OREB

DREB

12.3

REB/G

defense

STL

2.3 / game

BLK

2.0 / game

STL+BLK

4.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

33%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.