ORtg
76.9
53rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Asaad Kaidar Ahmed Youssef Hendawy
EGY · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder8.8 RPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
8.8 RPGRebounding · 97th event percentile
9.8 PPGScoring load · 84th event percentile
- 51.1
- HESI v2.1
- #69
- of 138
- 71%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #69 of 138 · Established
HESI
51.1
Event performance
51st event percentile
PI
52.4
Prospect index
50th event percentile
ORtg
76.9
Points / 100 poss.
53rd event percentile
DRtg
81.1
Lower is better
42nd event percentile
NRtg
-4.2
Two-way margin
51st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 76.9 · 53rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.1 · Stop% 70.4% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
6 games · 143 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
8.8 RPG97th event percentile
Scoring load
9.8 PPG84th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
51.1
51st event percentile
Prospect index
52.4
50th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.9
53rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.1
42nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-4.2
51st event percentile
Stop percentage
70.4%
77th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.8 PPG
84th event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
68th event percentile
Rebounding
8.8 RPG
97th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
63rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.0% TS
52nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Rebounder
8.8 RPG · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 51st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.9 ORtg and 81.1 DRtg, producing a -4.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Rebounding
8.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 84th event percentile
Scoring load
9.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Defensive stops
70.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.8 PPG
84th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.0%
52nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.1%
48th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.8%
40th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
19.6%
context7.7 attempts per game
Free throws
60.0%
65th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.0%
50th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
68th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.1
42nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.5
86th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.4%
77th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
63rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
41.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-4.2
51st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-4.5
51st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
51.1
51st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
52.4
50th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.7%
70th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.8 RPG
97th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
143.4
context23.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#69
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Clipvs south Sudan · 2026-09-02 · scout: Ahmed TareqYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
2026-09-02
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.5
APG
#69
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#1
RANK
70
FIELD
100%
PERCENTILE
15.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#69/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.5
APG
2.7
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.8
P84
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
8.8
P97
True shooting
37%
P52
Two-way impact
-4.2
P51
Stops
70%
P77
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
19 made / 71 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
9 made / 46 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
12 made / 20 attempts
Shot selection
65% of attempts from three
●2PA 25●3PA 46
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
59
PTS
9.8 / game
19–71
FGM–FGA
9–46
3PM–3PA
12–20
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
53
REB
8.8 / game
15
OREB
38
DREB
8.8
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
5
BLK
0.8 / game
18
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
51.1
HESI
52.4
PI
76.9
ORtg
81.1
DRtg
-4.2
NRtg
-4.5
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
5%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
+4.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#1/70view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
15.5
PPG
9.0
RPG
1.8
APG
2.8
TOV/G
2.8
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
15.5
P92
Playmaking
1.8
P66
Rebounding
9.0
P89
True shooting
58%
P90
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
46%
23 made / 50 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
42%
11 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
●2PA 24●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
62
PTS
15.5 / game
23–50
FGM–FGA
11–26
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
11
TOV
2.8 / game
0.64×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
36
REB
9.0 / game
13
OREB
23
DREB
9.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
9
BLK
2.3 / game
7
PF
14
STL+BLK
3.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
57%
eFG%
6%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #68Omar MostafaPG · Egyptrank_below · #70Sofiane Ben Bougrine Ben RezoukMorocco
//current_rank
#69
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#67
Small Forward · Rwanda
15.0 PPG 8.8 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.2 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity8.8 RPG + 3.2 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#68
#70
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
15.5
PPG
9.0
RPG
1.8
APG
1.3
SPG
2.3
BPG
—
3P%
58%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #69
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.8
PPG
8.8
RPG
1.5
APG
2.7
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.8
P84
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
8.8
P97
True shooting
37%
P52
Two-way impact
-4.2
P51
Stops
70%
P77
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
19 made / 71 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
9 made / 46 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
12 made / 20 attempts
Shot selection
65% of attempts from three
●2PA 25●3PA 46
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
59
PTS
9.8 / game
19–71
FGM–FGA
9–46
3PM–3PA
12–20
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
53
REB
8.8 / game
15
OREB
38
DREB
8.8
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
5
BLK
0.8 / game
18
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
51.1
HESI
52.4
PI
76.9
ORtg
81.1
DRtg
-4.2
NRtg
-4.5
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
5%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
+4.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
The line at a glance
15.5
PPG
9.0
RPG
1.8
APG
2.8
TOV/G
2.8
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
15.5
P92
Playmaking
1.8
P66
Rebounding
9.0
P89
True shooting
58%
P90
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
46%
23 made / 50 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
42%
11 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
52% of attempts from three
●2PA 24●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
62
PTS
15.5 / game
23–50
FGM–FGA
11–26
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
11
TOV
2.8 / game
0.64×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
36
REB
9.0 / game
13
OREB
23
DREB
9.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
9
BLK
2.3 / game
7
PF
14
STL+BLK
3.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
57%
eFG%
6%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.