Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Grace Ntoné

Forward · CMR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

175 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

44.3% TSScoring efficiency · 85th event percentile

5.5 PPGScoring load · 66th event percentile

72.3
HESI v2.1: #39
of 142: 65%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #39 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

72.3

Event performance

72nd event percentile

70.6

Prospect index

73rd event percentile

ORtg

80.2

Points / 100 poss.

83rd event percentile

DRtg

67.4

Lower is better

40th event percentile

NRtg

+12.8

Two-way margin

68th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 80.2 · 83rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 67.4 · Stop% 51.1% · Team DRtg 57.7

Sample context

6 games · 112 minutes · 65% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

44.3% TS85th event percentile

Scoring load

5.5 PPG66th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

72.3

72nd event percentile

Prospect index

70.6

73rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

80.2

83rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

67.4

40th event percentile

Two-way margin

+12.8

68th event percentile

Stop percentage

51.1%

16th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.5 PPG

66th event percentile

Creation

1.2 APG

57th event percentile

Rebounding

0.8 RPG

12th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.3% TS

85th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 72nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 80.2 ORtg and 67.4 DRtg, producing a +12.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
44.3% TS
85th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
80.2 ORtg
83rd event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+12.8 NRtg
68th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Rebounding
0.8 RPG
12th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive stops
51.1% Stop%
16th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
67.4 DRtg
40th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

80.2

83rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.5 PPG

66th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

44.3%

85th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

34.4%

65th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

28.1%

53rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

30.8%

context

2.2 attempts per game

Free throws

91.7%

97th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

34.1%

69th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.2 APG

57th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

67.4

40th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

57.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-9.7

10th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

51.1%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

42nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

25.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+12.8

68th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+5.4

72nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

72.3

72nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

70.6

73rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.2%

52nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

0.8 RPG

12th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

112.3

context

18.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#39

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

534.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.2

APG

#39

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#39/142Event board →

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.2

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #38Lalya DiarissoCôte d'Ivoire

//current_rank

#39

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #40Melissa Margareth TALIBAUganda

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#37
Alyssa Mendy
Forward · Senegal
9.8 PPG 6.2 RPG 3.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.2

APG

1.7

SPG

0.0

BPG

31%

3P%

44%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #39

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.2

APG

2.3

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

44%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.5

P66

Playmaking

1.2

P57

Rebounding

0.8

P12

True shooting

44%

P85

Two-way impact

+12.8

P68

Stops

51%

P16

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

28%

9 made / 32 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

Free throws

92%

11 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

●2PA 19●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.5 / game

9–32

FGM–FGA

4–13

3PM–3PA

11–12

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.2 / game

TOV

2.3 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

0.8 / game

OREB

DREB

0.8

REB/G

defense

STL

1.7 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

72.3

HESI

70.6

80.2

ORtg

67.4

DRtg

+12.8

NRtg

+5.4

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

34%

Floor%

34%

eFG%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

-9.7

Def. lift

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.