ORtg
56.3
20th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Lalya Diarisso
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
3.3 RPGRebounding · 59th event percentile
3.0 PPGScoring load · 35th event percentile
- 5.8
- HESI v2.1
- #181
- of 192
- 67%
- sample weight
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #181 of 192 · Established
HESI
5.8
Event performance
6th event percentile
PI
19.1
Prospect index
6th event percentile
ORtg
56.3
Points / 100 poss.
20th event percentile
DRtg
103.2
Lower is better
5th event percentile
NRtg
-46.9
Two-way margin
9th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 56.3 · 20th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 103.2 · Stop% 48.8% · Team DRtg 101.1
Sample context
7 games · 122 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
3.3 RPG59th event percentile
Scoring load
3.0 PPG35th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
5.8
6th event percentile
Prospect index
19.1
6th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
56.3
20th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.2
5th event percentile
Two-way margin
-46.9
9th event percentile
Stop percentage
48.8%
23rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.0 PPG
35th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
24th event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG
59th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
30th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.1% TS
31st event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 6th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 56.3 ORtg and 103.2 DRtg, producing a -46.9 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 5th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.2 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 9th event percentile
Two-way margin
-46.9 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 20th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
56.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.0 PPG
35th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.1%
31st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.2%
43rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.0%
40th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
37.5%
context1.1 attempts per game
Free throws
0.0%
3rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.3%
16th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
24th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
103.2
5th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
101.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.1
52nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
48.8%
23rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
30th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
25.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-46.9
9th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-31.3
6th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
5.8
6th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
19.1
6th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.3%
45th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.3 RPG
59th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
121.7
context17.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#181
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
589.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.6
APG
#181
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#38
RANK
142
FIELD
74%
PERCENTILE
0.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#181/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.0
P35
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
34%
P31
Two-way impact
-46.9
P9
Stops
49%
P23
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
9 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
28% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.0 / game
9–29
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
0–4
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.3 / game
4
OREB
19
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
5.8
HESI
19.1
PI
56.3
ORtg
103.2
DRtg
-46.9
NRtg
-31.3
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#38/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P11
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
2.8
P42
True shooting
20%
P15
Two-way impact
+20.5
P78
Stops
61%
P33
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
2–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.0 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
8
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.0
HESI
71.1
PI
69.4
ORtg
48.9
DRtg
+20.5
NRtg
+5.6
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
13%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-7.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#179
#180
#182
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
0.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.0
APG
0.6
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
20%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #181
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.0
P35
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
34%
P31
Two-way impact
-46.9
P9
Stops
49%
P23
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
9 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
28% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.0 / game
9–29
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
0–4
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.3 / game
4
OREB
19
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
5.8
HESI
19.1
PI
56.3
ORtg
103.2
DRtg
-46.9
NRtg
-31.3
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #38
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P11
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
2.8
P42
True shooting
20%
P15
Two-way impact
+20.5
P78
Stops
61%
P33
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
2–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.0 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
8
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.0
HESI
71.1
PI
69.4
ORtg
48.9
DRtg
+20.5
NRtg
+5.6
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
13%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-7.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.