Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Abigail Dia

CIV · b. 2009

//measurables

176 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.7 stocksDefensive activity · 72nd event percentile

5.7 PPGScoring load · 60th event percentile

7.3
HESI v2.1: #179
of 192: 51%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #179 of 192 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

7.3

Event performance

8th event percentile

20.4

Prospect index

7th event percentile

ORtg

48.7

Points / 100 poss.

13th event percentile

DRtg

104.5

Lower is better

3rd event percentile

NRtg

-55.7

Two-way margin

6th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 48.7 · 13th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 104.5 · Stop% 45.9% · Team DRtg 101.1

Sample context

3 games · 64 minutes · 51% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks72nd event percentile

Scoring load

5.7 PPG60th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

7.3

8th event percentile

Prospect index

20.4

7th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

48.7

13th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

104.5

3rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-55.7

6th event percentile

Stop percentage

45.9%

14th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.7 PPG

60th event percentile

Creation

0.7 APG

29th event percentile

Rebounding

3.0 RPG

55th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

72nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

27.7% TS

18th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 8th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 48.7 ORtg and 104.5 DRtg, producing a -55.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive activity
1.7 steals + blocks/G
72nd event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
104.5 DRtg
3rd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-55.7 NRtg
6th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
48.7 ORtg
13th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

48.7

13th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.7 PPG

60th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

27.7%

18th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

23.2%

15th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

21.4%

18th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

9.1%

context

3.7 attempts per game

Free throws

66.7%

63rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

23.3%

15th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.7 APG

29th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

104.5

3rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

101.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.4

38th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

45.9%

14th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

72nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

12.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-55.7

6th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-28.6

8th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

7.3

8th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

20.4

7th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.3%

11th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.0 RPG

55th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

63.6

context

21.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

51.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#179

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

589.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

0.7

APG

#179

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#179/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

0.7

APG

3.0

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

28%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.7

P60

Playmaking

0.7

P29

Rebounding

3.0

P55

True shooting

28%

P18

Two-way impact

-55.7

Stops

46%

P14

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

21%

6 made / 28 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

1 made / 11 attempts

Free throws

67%

4 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

39% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 11

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.7 / game

6–28

FGM–FGA

1–11

3PM–3PA

4–6

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.7 / game

TOV

3.0 / game

0.22×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.0 / game

OREB

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.7 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

7.3

HESI

20.4

48.7

ORtg

104.5

DRtg

-55.7

NRtg

-28.6

Stable NRtg

46%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-3.4

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #178Amelia Bianco RossignoliITA

//current_rank

#179

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #180Andrea LopezMEX

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.7

PPG

3.0

RPG

0.7

APG

1.0

SPG

0.7

BPG

3P%

28%

TS%

event_stats