ORtg
41.3
9th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Vendula Salakova
CZE · b. 2010
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 79th event percentile
1.4 APGCreation · 58th event percentile
- 6.8
- HESI v2.1
- #177
- of 192
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #177 of 192 · Established
HESI
6.8
Event performance
7th event percentile
PI
21.1
Prospect index
8th event percentile
ORtg
41.3
Points / 100 poss.
9th event percentile
DRtg
85.1
Lower is better
44th event percentile
NRtg
-43.8
Two-way margin
11th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 41.3 · 9th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 85.1 · Stop% 52.1% · Team DRtg 80.6
Sample context
7 games · 135 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks79th event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG58th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
6.8
7th event percentile
Prospect index
21.1
8th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.3
9th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.1
44th event percentile
Two-way margin
-43.8
11th event percentile
Stop percentage
52.1%
34th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.3 PPG
25th event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
2.6 RPG
43rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
79th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
20.2% TS
9th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 7th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 41.3 ORtg and 85.1 DRtg, producing a -43.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 79th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 9th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 9th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
20.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 11th event percentile
Two-way margin
-43.8 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.3 PPG
25th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
20.2%
9th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
18.9%
12th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
18.9%
13th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
33.3%
16th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
20.9%
11th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.4 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
85.1
44th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.5
31st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
52.1%
34th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
79th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-43.8
11th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-30.3
7th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
6.8
7th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
21.1
8th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.8%
11th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.6 RPG
43rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
135.1
context19.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#177
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
560.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
2.3
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
#177
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#177/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.3
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.3
P25
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
2.6
P43
True shooting
20%
P9
Two-way impact
-43.8
P11
Stops
52%
P34
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
7 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
2 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
2.3 / game
7–37
FGM–FGA
0–14
3PM–3PA
2–6
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
0.59×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
18
REB
2.6 / game
10
OREB
8
DREB
2.6
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
7
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
6.8
HESI
21.1
PI
41.3
ORtg
85.1
DRtg
-43.8
NRtg
-30.3
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
21%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
80.6
Team DRtg
-4.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #176Enija BrokaneLATrank_below · #178Amelia Bianco RossignoliITA
//current_rank
#177
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#175
#176
#178
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
2.3
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
1.3
SPG
0.7
BPG
0%
3P%
20%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #177
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.3
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.3
P25
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
2.6
P43
True shooting
20%
P9
Two-way impact
-43.8
P11
Stops
52%
P34
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
19%
7 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
2 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
2.3 / game
7–37
FGM–FGA
0–14
3PM–3PA
2–6
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
0.59×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
18
REB
2.6 / game
10
OREB
8
DREB
2.6
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
7
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
6.8
HESI
21.1
PI
41.3
ORtg
85.1
DRtg
-43.8
NRtg
-30.3
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
21%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
80.6
Team DRtg
-4.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.