Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Enija Brokane

LAT · b. 2009

//measurables

168 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.9 APGCreation · 70th event percentile

2.9 RPGRebounding · 52nd event percentile

8.4
HESI v2.1: #176
of 192: 65%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #176 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

8.4

Event performance

9th event percentile

21.2

Prospect index

9th event percentile

ORtg

49.4

Points / 100 poss.

14th event percentile

DRtg

88.1

Lower is better

31st event percentile

NRtg

-38.7

Two-way margin

14th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 49.4 · 14th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.1 · Stop% 50.8% · Team DRtg 84.9

Sample context

7 games · 114 minutes · 65% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.9 APG70th event percentile

Rebounding

2.9 RPG52nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

8.4

9th event percentile

Prospect index

21.2

9th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

49.4

14th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.1

31st event percentile

Two-way margin

-38.7

14th event percentile

Stop percentage

50.8%

30th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.7 PPG

16th event percentile

Creation

1.9 APG

70th event percentile

Rebounding

2.9 RPG

52nd event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks

24th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

25.0% TS

15th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 9th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 49.4 ORtg and 88.1 DRtg, producing a -38.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Creation
1.9 APG
70th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

Two-way margin
-38.7 NRtg
14th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
49.4 ORtg
14th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
25.0% TS
15th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

49.4

14th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.7 PPG

16th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

25.0%

15th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

25.0%

18th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.8%

16th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

13.3%

context

2.1 attempts per game

Floor%

21.0%

12th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.9 APG

70th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.1

31st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.2

38th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

50.8%

30th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.4 STL+BLK

24th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

23.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-38.7

14th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-25.3

9th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

8.4

9th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

21.2

9th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.6%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.9 RPG

52nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

113.8

context

16.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#176

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

560.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

1.7

PPG

2.9

RPG

1.9

APG

#176

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#176/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.7

PPG

2.9

RPG

1.9

APG

2.1

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

25%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.7

P16

Playmaking

1.9

P70

Rebounding

2.9

P52

True shooting

25%

P15

Two-way impact

-38.7

P14

Stops

51%

P30

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

21%

5 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

13%

2 made / 15 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

63% of attempts from three

●2PA 9●3PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.7 / game

5–24

FGM–FGA

2–15

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.9 / game

TOV

2.1 / game

0.87×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.9 / game

OREB

DREB

2.9

REB/G

defense

STL

0.4 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

8.4

HESI

21.2

49.4

ORtg

88.1

DRtg

-38.7

NRtg

-25.3

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

21%

Floor%

25%

eFG%

PIE

84.9

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #175Laura MarcolovaCZE

//current_rank

#176

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #177Vendula SalakovaCZE

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.7

PPG

2.9

RPG

1.9

APG

0.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

13%

3P%

25%

TS%

event_stats