ORtg
69.4
64th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Lalya Diarisso
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 APGCreation · 78th event percentile
2.8 RPGRebounding · 42nd event percentile
- 73.0
- HESI v2.1
- #38
- of 142
- 49%
- sample weight
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #38 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
73.0
Event performance
73rd event percentile
PI
71.1
Prospect index
74th event percentile
ORtg
69.4
Points / 100 poss.
64th event percentile
DRtg
48.9
Lower is better
83rd event percentile
NRtg
+20.5
Two-way margin
78th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 69.4 · 64th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 48.9 · Stop% 60.7% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
5 games · 57 minutes · 49% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.0 APG78th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG42nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
73.0
73rd event percentile
Prospect index
71.1
74th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.4
64th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
48.9
83rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+20.5
78th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.7%
33rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
11th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
78th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
42nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
25th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
20.0% TS
15th event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 73rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 69.4 ORtg and 48.9 DRtg, producing a +20.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and creation. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 83rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
48.9 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 78th event percentile
Two-way margin
+20.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 78th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 11th event percentile
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 15th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
20.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 25th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.8 PPG
11th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
20.0%
15th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
20.0%
25th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
20.0%
29th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.6 attempts per game
Floor%
33.3%
67th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
78th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
48.9
83rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-7.2
15th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.7%
33rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
25th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
15.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+20.5
78th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.6
73rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
73.0
73rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
71.1
74th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.6%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
42nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
57.2
context11.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
48.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#38
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.6
APG
#181
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#38
RANK
142
FIELD
74%
PERCENTILE
0.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#181/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.0
P35
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
34%
P31
Two-way impact
-46.9
P9
Stops
49%
P23
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
9 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
28% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.0 / game
9–29
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
0–4
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.3 / game
4
OREB
19
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
5.8
HESI
19.1
PI
56.3
ORtg
103.2
DRtg
-46.9
NRtg
-31.3
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#38/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P11
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
2.8
P42
True shooting
20%
P15
Two-way impact
+20.5
P78
Stops
61%
P33
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
2–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.0 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
8
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.0
HESI
71.1
PI
69.4
ORtg
48.9
DRtg
+20.5
NRtg
+5.6
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
13%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-7.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#179
#180
#182
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
0.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.0
APG
0.6
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
20%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #181
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.0
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.0
P35
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
34%
P31
Two-way impact
-46.9
P9
Stops
49%
P23
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
9 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
28% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
3.0 / game
9–29
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
0–4
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.3 / game
4
OREB
19
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
5.8
HESI
19.1
PI
56.3
ORtg
103.2
DRtg
-46.9
NRtg
-31.3
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
-2.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #38
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
20%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P11
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
2.8
P42
True shooting
20%
P15
Two-way impact
+20.5
P78
Stops
61%
P33
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
2–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.0 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
2.50×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
8
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.0
HESI
71.1
PI
69.4
ORtg
48.9
DRtg
+20.5
NRtg
+5.6
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
20%
eFG%
13%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-7.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.