Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Angelina Adhiambo Agiki

KEN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.6 stocksDefensive activity · 59th event percentile

3.2 RPGRebounding · 50th event percentile

19.9
HESI v2.1: #115
of 142: 53%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #115 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

19.9

Event performance

20th event percentile

27.4

Prospect index

19th event percentile

ORtg

40.3

Points / 100 poss.

29th event percentile

DRtg

72.8

Lower is better

25th event percentile

NRtg

-32.5

Two-way margin

26th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 40.3 · 29th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 72.8 · Stop% 58.7% · Team DRtg 69.2

Sample context

5 games · 68 minutes · 53% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.6 stocks59th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG50th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

19.9

20th event percentile

Prospect index

27.4

19th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

40.3

29th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

72.8

25th event percentile

Two-way margin

-32.5

26th event percentile

Stop percentage

58.7%

28th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.2 PPG

19th event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG

50th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.6 stocks

59th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

21.4% TS

18th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P91
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 20th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 40.3 ORtg and 72.8 DRtg, producing a -32.5 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring efficiency
21.4% TS
18th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Scoring load
1.2 PPG
19th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

40.3

29th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.2 PPG

19th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

21.4%

18th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

21.4%

27th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

21.4%

33rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.2 attempts per game

Floor%

20.1%

31st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

72.8

25th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

69.2

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.6

33rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

58.7%

28th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.6 STL+BLK

59th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

19.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-32.5

26th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-21.3

20th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

19.9

20th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

27.4

19th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-0.4%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.2 RPG

50th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

68.3

context

13.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

53.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#115

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

579.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

1.2

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

#115

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#18

RANK

FIELD

64%

PERCENTILE

4.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#115/142Event board →

1.2

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#18/48Event board →

4.0

PPG

7.2

RPG

1.2

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #114Hafusah KyomuhendoUganda

//current_rank

#115

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #116Salma Ben MoussaMorocco

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#113
Segolene Tchumsa
Forward · Cameroon
0.0 PPG 0.8 RPG 0.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.0

PPG

7.2

RPG

1.2

APG

0.6

SPG

2.0

BPG

—

3P%

36%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #115

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.2

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.0

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

21%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.2

P19

Playmaking

0.0

Rebounding

3.2

P50

True shooting

21%

P18

Two-way impact

-32.5

P26

Stops

59%

P28

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

21%

3 made / 14 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 1 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

7% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.2 / game

3–14

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.0 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.2 / game

OREB

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

1.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

19.9

HESI

27.4

40.3

ORtg

72.8

DRtg

-32.5

NRtg

-21.3

Stable NRtg

59%

Stop%

20%

Floor%

21%

eFG%

-0%

PIE

69.2

Team DRtg

-3.6

Def. lift

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026

5 GP · event rank #18

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.0

PPG

7.2

RPG

1.2

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.0

P43

Playmaking

1.2

P53

Rebounding

7.2

P86

True shooting

36%

P53

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

31%

8 made / 26 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

1 made / 4 attempts

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

15% of attempts from three

●2PA 22●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.0 / game

8–26

FGM–FGA

1–4

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.2 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

0.60×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

7.2 / game

OREB

DREB

7.2

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

2.0 / game

STL+BLK

2.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

33%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.