Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Salma Ben Moussa

MAR · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 31st event percentile

0.3 APGCreation · 26th event percentile

19.1
HESI v2.1: #116
of 142: 30%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #116 of 142 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

19.1

Event performance

19th event percentile

26.8

Prospect index

19th event percentile

ORtg

25.3

Points / 100 poss.

12th event percentile

DRtg

76.1

Lower is better

19th event percentile

NRtg

-50.8

Two-way margin

13th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 25.3 · 12th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 76.1 · Stop% 66.6% · Team DRtg 77.8

Sample context

3 games · 26 minutes · 30% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks31st event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG26th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

19.1

19th event percentile

Prospect index

26.8

19th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

25.3

12th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

76.1

19th event percentile

Two-way margin

-50.8

13th event percentile

Stop percentage

66.6%

54th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.3 PPG

21st event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG

26th event percentile

Rebounding

1.0 RPG

15th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

23.8% TS

22nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 19th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 25.3 ORtg and 76.1 DRtg, producing a -50.8 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
25.3 ORtg
12th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Two-way margin
-50.8 NRtg
13th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
15th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

25.3

12th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.3 PPG

21st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

23.8%

22nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

25.0%

36th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

25.0%

42nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.7 attempts per game

Free throws

20.0%

12th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

15.2%

17th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.3 APG

26th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

76.1

19th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.7

78th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

66.6%

54th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

31st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

8.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-50.8

13th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-21.4

19th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

19.1

19th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

26.8

19th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-8.0%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.0 RPG

15th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

26.1

context

8.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

30.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#116

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

366.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

1.3

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.3

APG

#116

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#116/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.3

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.3

APG

3.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

24%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.3

P21

Playmaking

0.3

P26

Rebounding

1.0

P15

True shooting

24%

P22

Two-way impact

-50.8

P13

Stops

67%

P54

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

25%

1 made / 4 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

50% of attempts from three

●2PA 2●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.3 / game

1–4

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

2–10

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.3 / game

TOV

3.0 / game

0.11×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.0 / game

OREB

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

19.1

HESI

26.8

25.3

ORtg

76.1

DRtg

-50.8

NRtg

-21.4

Stable NRtg

67%

Stop%

15%

Floor%

25%

eFG%

-8%

PIE

77.8

Team DRtg

+1.7

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #115Angelina Adhiambo AgikiKenya

//current_rank

#116

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #117Shivan MwesigwaUganda

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.3

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.3

APG

1.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

24%

TS%

event_stats