ORtg
93.7
84th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Nolan Ngangmeni
CMR · b. 2009
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.2 APGCreation · 83rd event percentile
46.4% TSScoring efficiency · 77th event percentile
- 90.5
- HESI v2.1
- #12
- of 138
- 69%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #12 of 138 · Established
HESI
90.5
Event performance
90th event percentile
PI
85.1
Prospect index
92nd event percentile
ORtg
93.7
Points / 100 poss.
84th event percentile
DRtg
68.9
Lower is better
75th event percentile
NRtg
+24.8
Two-way margin
89th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 93.7 · 84th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.9 · Stop% 61.9% · Team DRtg 65.9
Sample context
6 games · 131 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.2 APG83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS77th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
90.5
90th event percentile
Prospect index
85.1
92nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.7
84th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.9
75th event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.8
89th event percentile
Stop percentage
61.9%
54th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.3 PPG
76th event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
83rd event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
61st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
47th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS
77th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P89
Event Impact
90.5 HESI performance · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 90th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 93.7 ORtg and 68.9 DRtg, producing a +24.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and creation.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.8 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 84th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 83rd event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.3 PPG
76th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.4%
77th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
40.8%
71st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.6%
53rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context5.8 attempts per game
Free throws
90.9%
96th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.1%
61st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.2 APG
83rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.9
75th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
65.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.0
40th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
61.9%
54th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
47th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
33.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+24.8
89th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+15.3
90th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
90.5
90th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
85.1
92nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.5%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
61st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
130.5
context21.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#12
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-22 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-22
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
off_guard · wing · expanded secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
off_guard · wing · expanded secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Secondary creation, Shooting utility, Gap help.
Now · Off GuardNow · WingProjects · Off GuardProjects · Wing
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Secondary creation
- · Shooting utility
- · Gap help
Offensive translation
Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Secondary creation · Shooting utility
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive90.5 performance rating · rank 12 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 93.7 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive37.1% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive61.9% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.2
APG
#12
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#7
RANK
131
FIELD
95%
PERCENTILE
16.3
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#12/138Event board →
6
GP
8.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.2
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#7/131Event board →
6
GP
16.3
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #11Chris Junior EchuiF · Côte d'Ivoirerank_below · #13Karl Wabo-DepouillyC · Cameroon
//current_rank
#12
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#10
Harinosy A'Ranty Rasetriarivony
Point Guard · Madagascar
18.2 PPG 6.7 RPG 7.2 APG
//event_signalScorer18.2 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalCreator7.2 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
16.3
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.0
APG
1.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
38%
3P%
60%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #12
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.3
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.2
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.3
P76
Playmaking
2.2
P83
Rebounding
4.3
P61
True shooting
46%
P77
Two-way impact
+24.8
P89
Stops
62%
P54
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
31%
15 made / 49 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
10 made / 35 attempts
FT
Free throws
91%
10 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 14●3PA 35
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
50
PTS
8.3 / game
15–49
FGM–FGA
10–35
3PM–3PA
10–11
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
12
TOV
2.0 / game
1.08×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
26
REB
4.3 / game
10
OREB
16
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
90.5
HESI
85.1
PI
93.7
ORtg
68.9
DRtg
+24.8
NRtg
+15.3
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
9%
PIE
65.9
Team DRtg
-3.0
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.3
PPG
6.7
RPG
2.0
APG
4.5
TOV/G
2.5
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.3
P97
Playmaking
2.0
P77
Rebounding
6.7
P74
True shooting
60%
P100
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
26 made / 67 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
15 made / 40 attempts
FT
Free throws
91%
31 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 27●3PA 40
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
98
PTS
16.3 / game
26–67
FGM–FGA
15–40
3PM–3PA
31–34
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
27
TOV
4.5 / game
0.44×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
40
REB
6.7 / game
12
OREB
28
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
50%
eFG%
3%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.