back_to_rankings
Chris Junior Echui portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Chris Junior Echui

Forward · CIV · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

187 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

7.7 RPGRebounding · 89th event percentile

2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 79th event percentile

94.2
HESI v2.1
#11
of 138
66%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #11 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

94.2

Event performance

94th event percentile

PI

86.8

Prospect index

92nd event percentile

ORtg

91.1

Points / 100 poss.

82nd event percentile

DRtg

61.6

Lower is better

91st event percentile

NRtg

+29.4

Two-way margin

92nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 91.1 · 82nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 61.6 · Stop% 84.8% · Team DRtg 68.8

Sample context

6 games · 115 minutes · 66% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

7.7 RPG89th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks79th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

94.2

94th event percentile

Prospect index

86.8

92nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

91.1

82nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

61.6

91st event percentile

Two-way margin

+29.4

92nd event percentile

Stop percentage

84.8%

96th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.5 PPG

45th event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

44th event percentile

Rebounding

7.7 RPG

89th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

79th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

39.3% TS

59th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P93

    Defensive Impact

    61.6 DRtg · 85% Stop% · 93rd event percentile

  • P93

    Event Impact

    94.2 HESI performance · 93rd event percentile

  • P89

    Rebounder

    7.7 RPG · 89th event percentile

  • P89

    Two-Way Impact

    +29.4 Net Rating · 89th event percentile

  • P87

    Rim Protection

    1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile

  • P82

    Activity

    7.7 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 82nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 94th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.1 ORtg and 61.6 DRtg, producing a +29.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, two-way margin, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    84.8% Stop%

    96th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Two-way margin

    +29.4 NRtg

    92nd event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

  3. Defensive efficiency

    61.6 DRtg

    91st event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

91.1

82nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.5 PPG

45th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

39.3%

59th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

34.6%

54th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

34.6%

66th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

47.4%

36th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

47.3%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

44th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

61.6

91st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

68.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+7.2

94th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

84.8%

96th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

79th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

41.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+29.4

92nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+17.5

94th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

94.2

94th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

86.8

92nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

7.5%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.7 RPG

89th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

115.3

context

19.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#11

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

502.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

4.5

PPG

7.7

RPG

0.8

APG

#11

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

4.5

PPG

7.7

RPG

0.8

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Bacary Doucoure portrait#9

    Bacary Doucoure

    Center · Senegal

    7.7 PPG 5.0 RPG 0.5 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

4.5

PPG

7.7

RPG

0.8

APG

1.3

SPG

1.0

BPG

—

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #11

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.5

PPG

7.7

RPG

0.8

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.5

P45

Playmaking

0.8

P44

Rebounding

7.7

P89

True shooting

39%

P59

Two-way impact

+29.4

P92

Stops

85%

P96

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

9 made / 26 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

47%

9 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 26●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

27

PTS

4.5 / game

9–26

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

9–19

FTM–FTA

creation

5

AST

0.8 / game

6

TOV

1.0 / game

0.83×

AST:TOV

12

FD

rebounding

46

REB

7.7 / game

17

OREB

29

DREB

7.7

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

6

BLK

1.0 / game

11

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

94.2

HESI

86.8

PI

91.1

ORtg

61.6

DRtg

+29.4

NRtg

+17.5

Stable NRtg

85%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

35%

eFG%

7%

PIE

68.8

Team DRtg

+7.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games115 minutes19.2 min/game66% sample weightrank #11 of 138

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.