back_to_rankings
Bacary Doucoure portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Bacary Doucoure

Center · SEN · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

209 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

3
film items
0
scout badges
On file
scout report

01

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Rwanda U18 · 2026-09-20 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

  • Clipvs vs Tunisia U18 · 2026-09-20 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip
  • Clipvs vs Tunisia U18 · 2026-09-20 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip

02

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-20

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · expanded offensive rebounder

forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · expanded offensive rebounder. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Post play, Switching, Post defense.

Now · ForwardNow · BigProjects · ForwardProjects · Big

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

  • · Post play
  • · Switching
  • · Post defense

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a short-roll connector. Can take on more offensive rebounder responsibility at the target level. post / mismatch option usage likely scales down from the current situational load.

Defensive assignments

primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Post play · Switching

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

3 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

LM D1

Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

92.7 performance rating · rank 9 · 6 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 96.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

50.1% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

55.4% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.

03

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #9 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

92.7

Event performance

92nd event percentile

PI

88.1

Prospect index

94th event percentile

ORtg

96.2

Points / 100 poss.

86th event percentile

DRtg

67.8

Lower is better

78th event percentile

NRtg

+28.4

Two-way margin

92nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 96.2 · 86th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 67.8 · Stop% 55.4% · Team DRtg 60.6

Sample context

6 games · 124 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

52.7% TS89th event percentile

Scoring load

7.7 PPG72nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

92.7

92nd event percentile

Prospect index

88.1

94th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

96.2

86th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

67.8

78th event percentile

Two-way margin

+28.4

92nd event percentile

Stop percentage

55.4%

39th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.7 PPG

72nd event percentile

Creation

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Rebounding

5.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

52.7% TS

89th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P92

    Event Impact

    92.7 HESI performance · 92nd event percentile

  • P92

    Rim Protection

    1.2 BPG · 92nd event percentile

  • P86

    Offensive Impact

    96.2 ORtg · 86th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 92nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 96.2 ORtg and 67.8 DRtg, producing a +28.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

  1. Two-way margin

    +28.4 NRtg

    92nd event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    52.7% TS

    89th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  3. Offensive efficiency

    96.2 ORtg

    86th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.5 APG

    29th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Defensive stops

    55.4% Stop%

    39th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

96.2

86th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.7 PPG

72nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

52.7%

89th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

50.0%

88th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

50.0%

93rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.7 attempts per game

Free throws

54.5%

54th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

50.1%

95th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

67.8

78th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

60.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-7.2

11th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

55.4%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.5 STL+BLK

57th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

27.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+28.4

92nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+17.4

92nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

92.7

92nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

88.1

94th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

9.1%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

124.3

context

20.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#9

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

470.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

04

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

7.7

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.5

APG

#9

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

7.7

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.5

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • N'Dji Ibourahima Coulibaly portrait#7

    N'Dji Ibourahima Coulibaly

    Mali

    9.3 PPG 2.8 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

05

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

7.7

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.5

APG

0.3

SPG

1.2

BPG

0%

3P%

53%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #9

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.7

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.5

APG

1.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.7

P72

Playmaking

0.5

P29

Rebounding

5.0

P69

True shooting

53%

P89

Two-way impact

+28.4

P92

Stops

55%

P39

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

50%

17 made / 34 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 4 attempts

FT

Free throws

55%

12 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

12% of attempts from three

●2PA 30●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

46

PTS

7.7 / game

17–34

FGM–FGA

0–4

3PM–3PA

12–22

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.5 / game

9

TOV

1.5 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

14

FD

rebounding

30

REB

5.0 / game

15

OREB

15

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.3 / game

7

BLK

1.2 / game

14

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

92.7

HESI

88.1

PI

96.2

ORtg

67.8

DRtg

+28.4

NRtg

+17.4

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

50%

Floor%

50%

eFG%

9%

PIE

60.6

Team DRtg

-7.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games124 minutes20.7 min/game67% sample weightrank #9 of 138

06

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.