ORtg
96.2
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · SEN · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
209 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile3 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Rwanda U18 · 2026-09-20 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-20
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · expanded offensive rebounder
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · expanded offensive rebounder. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Post play, Switching, Post defense.
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a short-roll connector. Can take on more offensive rebounder responsibility at the target level. post / mismatch option usage likely scales down from the current situational load.
Defensive assignments
primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Post play · Switching
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
LM D1
Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive92.7 performance rating · rank 9 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 96.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive50.1% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive55.4% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #9 of 138 · Established
HESI
92.7
Event performance
92nd event percentile
PI
88.1
Prospect index
94th event percentile
ORtg
96.2
Points / 100 poss.
86th event percentile
DRtg
67.8
Lower is better
78th event percentile
NRtg
+28.4
Two-way margin
92nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 96.2 · 86th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 67.8 · Stop% 55.4% · Team DRtg 60.6
Sample context
6 games · 124 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
92.7
92nd event percentile
Prospect index
88.1
94th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
96.2
86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
67.8
78th event percentile
Two-way margin
+28.4
92nd event percentile
Stop percentage
55.4%
39th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
7.7 PPG
72nd event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
69th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.7% TS
89th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Impact
92.7 HESI performance · 92nd event percentile
Rim Protection
1.2 BPG · 92nd event percentile
Offensive Impact
96.2 ORtg · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 92nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 96.2 ORtg and 67.8 DRtg, producing a +28.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive stops.
Two-way margin
+28.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Scoring efficiency
52.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
96.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Defensive stops
55.4% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
96.2
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
7.7 PPG
72nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.7%
89th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
93rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.7 attempts per game
Free throws
54.5%
54th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
50.1%
95th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
67.8
78th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
60.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-7.2
11th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.4%
39th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
57th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+28.4
92nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+17.4
92nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
92.7
92nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.1
94th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.1%
74th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
69th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
124.3
context20.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#9
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
470.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.5
APG
#9
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#9
of 138 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.5
APG
0.3
SPG
1.2
BPG
0%
3P%
53%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
7.7
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.5
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.7
P72
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
5.0
P69
True shooting
53%
P89
Two-way impact
+28.4
P92
Stops
55%
P39
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
50%
17 made / 34 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
55%
12 made / 22 attempts
Shot selection
12% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
46
PTS
7.7 / game
17–34
FGM–FGA
0–4
3PM–3PA
12–22
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.5 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
15
OREB
15
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
7
BLK
1.2 / game
14
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
92.7
HESI
88.1
PI
96.2
ORtg
67.8
DRtg
+28.4
NRtg
+17.4
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
50%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
9%
PIE
60.6
Team DRtg
-7.2
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.