ORtg
88.7
79th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
N'Dji Ibourahima Coulibaly
MLI · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
3.0 stocksDefensive activity · 82nd event percentile
9.3 PPGScoring load · 79th event percentile
- 93.4
- HESI v2.1
- #7
- of 138
- 65%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #7 of 138 · Established
HESI
93.4
Event performance
93rd event percentile
PI
88.6
Prospect index
95th event percentile
ORtg
88.7
Points / 100 poss.
79th event percentile
DRtg
58.7
Lower is better
97th event percentile
NRtg
+30.0
Two-way margin
93rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 88.7 · 79th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 58.7 · Stop% 79.5% · Team DRtg 62.7
Sample context
6 games · 110 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks82nd event percentile
Scoring load
9.3 PPG79th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
93.4
93rd event percentile
Prospect index
88.6
95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
88.7
79th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
58.7
97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.0
93rd event percentile
Stop percentage
79.5%
91st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.3 PPG
79th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
63rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
37th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks
82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.9% TS
61st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P94
Defensive Impact
58.7 DRtg · 80% Stop% · 94th event percentile
- P93
Event Impact
93.4 HESI performance · 93rd event percentile
- P89
Two-Way Impact
+30.0 Net Rating · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 93rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 88.7 ORtg and 58.7 DRtg, producing a +30.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
58.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+30.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 91st event percentile
Defensive stops
79.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 37th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.3 PPG
79th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.9%
61st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.5%
63rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
34.4%
64th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context3.0 attempts per game
Free throws
57.1%
59th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.1%
81st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
63rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
58.7
97th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.9
85th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
79.5%
91st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.0 STL+BLK
82nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
35.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+30.0
93rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+17.5
93rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
93.4
93rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.6
95th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.4%
66th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
37th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
109.6
context18.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#7
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Gabon U18 · 2026-09-25 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-25
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
wing · off_guard · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
wing · off_guard · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Offensive rebounding, Gap help, Secondary creation.
Now · WingNow · Off GuardProjects · WingProjects · Off Guard
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Offensive rebounding
- · Gap help
- · Secondary creation
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker. Projects to retain a primary role as a offensive rebounder.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 1.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Offensive rebounding · Gap help
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive93.4 performance rating · rank 7 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 88.7 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive42.1% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive79.5% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
#7
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#7/138Event board →
6
GP
9.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#10/131Event board →
6
GP
11.2
PPG
6.2
RPG
3.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #6Mohamed KeitaMalirank_below · #8Idriss ToumiSG · Tunisia
//current_rank
#7
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#5
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
9.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
2.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
22%
3P%
40%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.3
P79
Playmaking
1.3
P63
Rebounding
2.8
P37
True shooting
40%
P61
Two-way impact
+30.0
P93
Stops
80%
P91
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
34%
22 made / 64 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
4 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
8 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
28% of attempts from three
●2PA 46●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
56
PTS
9.3 / game
22–64
FGM–FGA
4–18
3PM–3PA
8–14
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.3 / game
9
TOV
1.5 / game
0.89×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
17
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
11
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.7 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
16
PF
18
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
93.4
HESI
88.6
PI
88.7
ORtg
58.7
DRtg
+30.0
NRtg
+17.5
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
5%
PIE
62.7
Team DRtg
+3.9
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #10
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.2
PPG
6.2
RPG
3.3
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.2
P86
Playmaking
3.3
P90
Rebounding
6.2
P71
True shooting
47%
P89
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
45%
28 made / 62 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
3 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
36%
8 made / 22 attempts
Shot selection
24% of attempts from three
●2PA 47●3PA 15
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
67
PTS
11.2 / game
28–62
FGM–FGA
3–15
3PM–3PA
8–22
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
3.3 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.95×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
12
OREB
25
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
16
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
48%
eFG%
2%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.