ORtg
110.7
97th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Shooting Guard · TUN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
203 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile14 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured highlight
HighlightStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Idriss for 3
vs Cameroon · scout: Zeiad Hamouda
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-08-31
The player offers excellent size for a guard at 203 cm, giving him an advantage when defending and attacking against smaller guards . He attacks the basket aggressively and has a strong ability to score effectively in both Set play or Fast Break
strengths
Athleticism Team Work Defence
areas_to_improve
Shooting Passing
Context-adjusted within the evaluation event pool.
//overall · event_scoped
methodology
HESI scouting evaluation (position-weighted attribute model)
FIBA U18 AFROBASKET
OVR is context-adjusted using event-specific competition data. It reflects performance within this event pool only and should not be compared directly across leagues, regions or age groups.
Event-scoped rating: computed within a single event/pool. Not comparable across leagues, regions, or age groups.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #8 of 138 · Established
HESI
96.3
Event performance
96th event percentile
PI
88.6
Prospect index
95th event percentile
ORtg
110.7
Points / 100 poss.
97th event percentile
DRtg
76.7
Lower is better
55th event percentile
NRtg
+34.0
Two-way margin
95th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 110.7 · 97th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 76.7 · Stop% 55.2% · Team DRtg 72.7
Sample context
6 games · 166 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
96.3
96th event percentile
Prospect index
88.6
95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
110.7
97th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.7
55th event percentile
Two-way margin
+34.0
95th event percentile
Stop percentage
55.2%
36th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
13.7 PPG
92nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
2.7 RPG
34th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.4% TS
87th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Offensive Impact
110.7 ORtg · 97th event percentile
Event Impact
96.3 HESI performance · 96th event percentile
Scorer
13.7 PPG · 92nd event percentile
Event Efficiency
52% TS on 13.7 PPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 96th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 110.7 ORtg and 76.7 DRtg, producing a +34.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are rebounding and defensive stops.
Offensive efficiency
110.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+34.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Scoring load
13.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
2.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive stops
55.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
110.7
97th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
13.7 PPG
92nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.4%
87th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.6%
84th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
39.1%
77th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
31.7%
context6.8 attempts per game
Free throws
71.4%
79th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.4%
90th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
76.7
55th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.1
34th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.2%
36th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
36.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+34.0
95th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+23.5
96th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
96.3
96th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.6
95th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
15.0%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.7 RPG
34th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
165.9
context27.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#8
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
476.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
13.7
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.0
APG
#8
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
13.7
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
4
GP
4.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#8
of 138 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
13.7
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.0
APG
1.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
32%
3P%
52%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
13.7
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.0
APG
0.5
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
13.7
P92
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
2.7
P34
True shooting
52%
P87
Two-way impact
+34.0
P95
Stops
55%
P36
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
39%
27 made / 69 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
13 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
15 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
59% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
82
PTS
13.7 / game
27–69
FGM–FGA
13–41
3PM–3PA
15–21
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
3
TOV
0.5 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.7 / game
3
OREB
13
DREB
2.7
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.7 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
3
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
96.3
HESI
88.6
PI
110.7
ORtg
76.7
DRtg
+34.0
NRtg
+23.5
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
49%
eFG%
15%
PIE
72.7
Team DRtg
-4.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
4.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.5
APG
0.5
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.8
P50
Playmaking
2.5
P78
Rebounding
4.0
P59
True shooting
42%
P69
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
6 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
4 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
19
PTS
4.8 / game
6–21
FGM–FGA
4–15
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.5 / game
2
TOV
0.5 / game
5.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
2
OREB
14
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
38%
eFG%
7%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.