ORtg
97.1
87th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Mohamed Keita
MLI · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
13.7 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile
48.0% TSScoring efficiency · 80th event percentile
- 94.9
- HESI v2.1
- #6
- of 138
- 70%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #6 of 138 · Established
HESI
94.9
Event performance
95th event percentile
PI
89.8
Prospect index
96th event percentile
ORtg
97.1
Points / 100 poss.
87th event percentile
DRtg
65.6
Lower is better
82nd event percentile
NRtg
+31.5
Two-way margin
95th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 97.1 · 87th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 65.6 · Stop% 63.2% · Team DRtg 62.7
Sample context
6 games · 140 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
13.7 PPG92nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.0% TS80th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
94.9
95th event percentile
Prospect index
89.8
96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
97.1
87th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
65.6
82nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+31.5
95th event percentile
Stop percentage
63.2%
59th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
13.7 PPG
92nd event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
68th event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
40th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
58th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.0% TS
80th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Event Impact
94.9 HESI performance · 95th event percentile
- P92
Scorer
13.7 PPG · 92nd event percentile
- P87
Offensive Impact
97.1 ORtg · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 97.1 ORtg and 65.6 DRtg, producing a +31.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, scoring load, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Two-way margin
+31.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 92nd event percentile
Scoring load
13.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 87th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
97.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 40th event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
13.7 PPG
92nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
48.0%
80th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.5%
79th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.3%
79th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.9%
context5.8 attempts per game
Free throws
63.2%
68th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
44.7%
86th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
68th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
65.6
82nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.9
42nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
63.2%
59th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
58th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
36.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+31.5
95th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+20.4
95th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
94.9
95th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
89.8
96th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
10.8%
89th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.0 RPG
40th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
139.8
context23.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#6
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
493.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Gabon U18 · 2026-09-25 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-25
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker
off_guard · wing · secondary creator / connector · spacing / shooting option · closeout attacker. Best current separators: Finishing, Secondary creation. Primary pressure points: Gap help.
Now · Off GuardNow · WingProjects · Off GuardProjects · Wing
Translatable strengths
- · Finishing
- · Secondary creation
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Gap help
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Projects to retain a primary role as a closeout attacker.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary off-ball chaser (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Fits as a secondary creator who attacks tilted floors and keeps the defense rotating. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
A low-spacing environment that removes driving and connective passing windows.
Development priorities
Gap help
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
MM D1
Mid-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive94.9 performance rating · rank 6 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 97.1 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive44.7% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive63.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
13.7
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.5
APG
#6
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#2
RANK
131
FIELD
99%
PERCENTILE
12.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#6/138Event board →
6
GP
13.7
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.5
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
#2/131Event board →
6
GP
12.0
PPG
9.0
RPG
4.3
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
rank_above · #5Karl-Randell Kouame-ZezeSG · Côte d'Ivoirerank_below · #7N'Dji Ibourahima CoulibalyMali
//current_rank
#6
of 138 ranked
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#4
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U16 AfroBasket · 2025 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
12.0
PPG
9.0
RPG
4.3
APG
3.3
SPG
0.7
BPG
25%
3P%
52%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #6
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.7
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.7
P92
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
3.0
P40
True shooting
48%
P80
Two-way impact
+31.5
P95
Stops
63%
P59
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
40%
31 made / 77 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
23%
8 made / 35 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
12 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 42●3PA 35
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
82
PTS
13.7 / game
31–77
FGM–FGA
8–35
3PM–3PA
12–19
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.64×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
18
REB
3.0 / game
6
OREB
12
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
94.9
HESI
89.8
PI
97.1
ORtg
65.6
DRtg
+31.5
NRtg
+20.4
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
11%
PIE
62.7
Team DRtg
-2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #2
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.0
PPG
9.0
RPG
4.3
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.0
P91
Playmaking
4.3
P97
Rebounding
9.0
P89
True shooting
52%
P93
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
47%
29 made / 62 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
3 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
69%
11 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
19% of attempts from three
●2PA 50●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
72
PTS
12.0 / game
29–62
FGM–FGA
3–12
3PM–3PA
11–16
FTM–FTA
creation
26
AST
4.3 / game
23
TOV
3.8 / game
1.13×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
54
REB
9.0 / game
8
OREB
46
DREB
9.0
REB/G
defense
20
STL
3.3 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
10
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
49%
eFG%
5%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.