ORtg
86.6
90th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Yasmin Ahmed
Power Forward · EGY · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
3.0 APGCreation · 91st event percentile
45.5% TSScoring efficiency · 89th event percentile
- 91.5
- HESI v2.1
- #15
- of 142
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
5 public videos
Available for visual validation
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #15 of 142 · Established
HESI
91.5
Event performance
91st event percentile
PI
84.7
Prospect index
90th event percentile
ORtg
86.6
Points / 100 poss.
90th event percentile
DRtg
49.9
Lower is better
83rd event percentile
NRtg
+36.8
Two-way margin
90th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 86.6 · 90th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 49.9 · Stop% 88.9% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 109 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
3.0 APG91st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.5% TS89th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
91.5
91st event percentile
Prospect index
84.7
90th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
86.6
90th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
49.9
83rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+36.8
90th event percentile
Stop percentage
88.9%
91st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.3 PPG
82nd event percentile
Creation
3.0 APG
91st event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
79th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.5% TS
89th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P91
Creator
3.0 APG · 91st event percentile
- P91
Event Impact
91.5 HESI performance · 91st event percentile
- P90
Offensive Impact
86.6 ORtg · 90th event percentile
- P89
Event Efficiency
46% TS on 8.3 PPG · 89th event percentile
- P89
Two-Way Impact
+36.8 Net Rating · 89th event percentile
- P87
Defensive Impact
49.9 DRtg · 89% Stop% · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 91st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 86.6 ORtg and 49.9 DRtg, producing a +36.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, creation, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 91st event percentile
Defensive stops
88.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 91st event percentile
Creation
3.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 90th event percentile
Two-way margin
+36.8 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.3 PPG
82nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.5%
89th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.2%
89th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
72nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.5%
context5.7 attempts per game
Free throws
77.8%
92nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.3%
74th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.0 APG
91st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
49.9
83rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.8
93rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
88.9%
91st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
43.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+36.8
90th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+20.7
91st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
91.5
91st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
84.7
90th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.7%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.0 RPG
79th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
109.0
context18.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#15
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured highlight
HighlightStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Highlight
scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceHighlight
03
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
3.0
APG
#15
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#3
RANK
48
FIELD
96%
PERCENTILE
9.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#15/142Event board →
6
GP
8.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
3.0
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#3/48Event board →
5
GP
9.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #14Favour Joy AnariNigeriarank_below · #16Fatima DioufCôte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#15
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#13
04
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
9.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
1.4
SPG
1.6
BPG
—
3P%
55%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #15
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
3.0
APG
2.2
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.3
P82
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
6.0
P79
True shooting
46%
P89
Two-way impact
+36.8
P90
Stops
89%
P91
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
17 made / 51 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
9 made / 34 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
67% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 34
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
50
PTS
8.3 / game
17–51
FGM–FGA
9–34
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
18
AST
3.0 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
1.38×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
36
REB
6.0 / game
2
OREB
34
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
14
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
91.5
HESI
84.7
PI
86.6
ORtg
49.9
DRtg
+36.8
NRtg
+20.7
Stable NRtg
89%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
42%
eFG%
13%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
+6.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #3
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.0
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.4
TOV/G
1.6
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.0
P76
Playmaking
2.0
P73
Rebounding
5.0
P65
True shooting
55%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
17 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
8 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
51% of attempts from three
●2PA 19●3PA 20
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
45
PTS
9.0 / game
17–39
FGM–FGA
8–20
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
2.0 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.83×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
25
REB
5.0 / game
1
OREB
24
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.4 / game
8
BLK
1.6 / game
6
PF
15
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
54%
eFG%
7%
PIE
05
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.