ORtg
84.1
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
NGR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile5 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-09
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #14 of 142 · Established
HESI
90.1
Event performance
90th event percentile
PI
84.8
Prospect index
90th event percentile
ORtg
84.1
Points / 100 poss.
86th event percentile
DRtg
56.2
Lower is better
77th event percentile
NRtg
+27.9
Two-way margin
83rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 84.1 · 86th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 56.2 · Stop% 83.6% · Team DRtg 62.0
Sample context
6 games · 192 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring load
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
90.1
90th event percentile
Prospect index
84.8
90th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
84.1
86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
56.2
77th event percentile
Two-way margin
+27.9
83rd event percentile
Stop percentage
83.6%
87th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
14.5 PPG
95th event percentile
Creation
5.0 APG
98th event percentile
Rebounding
5.2 RPG
73rd event percentile
Defensive activity
5.3 stocks
75th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.2% TS
91st event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
5.0 APG · 98th event percentile
Scorer
14.5 PPG · 95th event percentile
Event Efficiency
46% TS on 14.5 PPG · 91st event percentile
Event Impact
90.1 HESI performance · 86th event percentile
Offensive Impact
84.1 ORtg · 86th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+27.9 Net Rating · 84th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 90th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.1 ORtg and 56.2 DRtg, producing a +27.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.
Creation
5.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
14.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
46.2% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
84.1
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
14.5 PPG
95th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.2%
91st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
38.3%
78th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.1%
78th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
19.2%
context4.3 attempts per game
Free throws
71.8%
87th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.6%
85th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.0 APG
98th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
56.2
77th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.8
90th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
83.6%
87th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
5.3 STL+BLK
75th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
71.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+27.9
83rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+19.3
90th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
90.1
90th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
84.8
90th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
22.2%
96th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.2 RPG
73rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
192.0
context32.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
76.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#14
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
543.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
14.5
PPG
5.2
RPG
5.0
APG
#14
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
14.5
PPG
5.2
RPG
5.0
APG
5.0
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.5
P95
Playmaking
5.0
P98
Rebounding
5.2
P73
True shooting
46%
P91
Two-way impact
+27.9
P83
Stops
84%
P87
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
35%
27 made / 77 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
28 made / 39 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
87
PTS
14.5 / game
27–77
FGM–FGA
5–26
3PM–3PA
28–39
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
5.0 / game
30
TOV
5.0 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
29
FD
rebounding
31
REB
5.2 / game
7
OREB
24
DREB
5.2
REB/G
defense
31
STL
5.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
17
PF
32
STL+BLK
5.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
90.1
HESI
84.8
PI
84.1
ORtg
56.2
DRtg
+27.9
NRtg
+19.3
Stable NRtg
84%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
22%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
+5.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#14
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
14.5
PPG
5.2
RPG
5.0
APG
5.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
19%
3P%
46%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #14
//quick_read
14.5
PPG
5.2
RPG
5.0
APG
5.0
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.5
P95
Playmaking
5.0
P98
Rebounding
5.2
P73
True shooting
46%
P91
Two-way impact
+27.9
P83
Stops
84%
P87
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
35%
27 made / 77 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
28 made / 39 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
87
PTS
14.5 / game
27–77
FGM–FGA
5–26
3PM–3PA
28–39
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
5.0 / game
30
TOV
5.0 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
29
FD
rebounding
31
REB
5.2 / game
7
OREB
24
DREB
5.2
REB/G
defense
31
STL
5.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
17
PF
32
STL+BLK
5.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
90.1
HESI
84.8
PI
84.1
ORtg
56.2
DRtg
+27.9
NRtg
+19.3
Stable NRtg
84%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
22%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
+5.8
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.