ORtg
95.4
97th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Awa Bathe
Combo Guard · MLI · b. 2008
//measurables
171 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
44.2% TSScoring efficiency · 84th event percentile
5.2 PPGScoring load · 64th event percentile
- 83.0
- HESI v2.1
- #26
- of 142
- 41%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #26 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
83.0
Event performance
83rd event percentile
PI
77.9
Prospect index
82nd event percentile
ORtg
95.4
Points / 100 poss.
97th event percentile
DRtg
50.7
Lower is better
82nd event percentile
NRtg
+44.7
Two-way margin
95th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 95.4 · 97th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 50.7 · Stop% 60.9% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
5 games · 42 minutes · 41% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS84th event percentile
Scoring load
5.2 PPG64th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
83.0
83rd event percentile
Prospect index
77.9
82nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
95.4
97th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
50.7
82nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+44.7
95th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.9%
33rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.2 PPG
64th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
42nd event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
15th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
31st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS
84th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 83rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 95.4 ORtg and 50.7 DRtg, producing a +44.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive activity, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
95.4 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 95th event percentile
Two-way margin
+44.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.2% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 15th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 31st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 33rd event percentile
Defensive stops
60.9% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.2 PPG
64th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.2%
84th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.8%
94th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.9%
88th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
21.1%
context3.8 attempts per game
Free throws
0.0%
5th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
40.7%
88th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
42nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
50.7
82nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.7
18th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.9%
33rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
31st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+44.7
95th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+13.3
83rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
83.0
83rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
77.9
82nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.4%
71st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
15th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
41.7
context8.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
41.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#26
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.2
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.8
APG
#26
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#26/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.2
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.2
P64
Playmaking
0.8
P42
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
44%
P84
Two-way impact
+44.7
P95
Stops
61%
P33
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
11 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
21%
4 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
66% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
5.2 / game
11–29
FGM–FGA
4–19
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.0 / game
1
OREB
4
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
0
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.0
HESI
77.9
PI
95.4
ORtg
50.7
DRtg
+44.7
NRtg
+13.3
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
4%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
-6.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #25Khadijah AlliNigeriarank_below · #27Maelhys N'driCôte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#26
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#24
#25
#27
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
5.2
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.8
APG
1.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
21%
3P%
44%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #26
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.2
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.2
P64
Playmaking
0.8
P42
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
44%
P84
Two-way impact
+44.7
P95
Stops
61%
P33
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
11 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
21%
4 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
66% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
5.2 / game
11–29
FGM–FGA
4–19
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.0 / game
1
OREB
4
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
0
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.0
HESI
77.9
PI
95.4
ORtg
50.7
DRtg
+44.7
NRtg
+13.3
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
4%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
-6.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.