ORtg
104.1
95th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MAR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile2 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-16
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #20 of 138 · Established
HESI
86.1
Event performance
86th event percentile
PI
81.6
Prospect index
86th event percentile
ORtg
104.1
Points / 100 poss.
95th event percentile
DRtg
85.0
Lower is better
32nd event percentile
NRtg
+19.1
Two-way margin
82nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 104.1 · 95th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 85.0 · Stop% 54.5% · Team DRtg 83.1
Sample context
5 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Rebounding
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
86.1
86th event percentile
Prospect index
81.6
86th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.1
95th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.0
32nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+19.1
82nd event percentile
Stop percentage
54.5%
33rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
10.6 PPG
85th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
8.0 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.4 stocks
48th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
53.7% TS
92nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Offensive Impact
104.1 ORtg · 95th event percentile
Event Efficiency
54% TS on 10.6 PPG · 92nd event percentile
Rebounder
8.0 RPG · 92nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 86th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.1 ORtg and 85.0 DRtg, producing a +19.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and defensive stops.
Offensive efficiency
104.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Scoring efficiency
53.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Rebounding
8.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive efficiency
85.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
54.5% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
104.1
95th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
10.6 PPG
85th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
53.7%
92nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
54.2%
97th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
93rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
33.3%
18th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
48.4%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
85.0
32nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
83.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.9
47th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.5%
33rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.4 STL+BLK
48th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
33.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+19.1
82nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+12.0
86th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
86.1
86th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
81.6
86th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.5%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.0 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
147.2
context29.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#20
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
412.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
10.6
PPG
8.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#20
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
10.6
PPG
8.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
54%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.6
P85
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
8.0
P92
True shooting
54%
P92
Two-way impact
+19.1
P82
Stops
55%
P33
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
50%
24 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
4 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
53
PTS
10.6 / game
24–48
FGM–FGA
4–16
3PM–3PA
1–3
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
9
TOV
1.8 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
40
REB
8.0 / game
19
OREB
21
DREB
8.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
86.1
HESI
81.6
PI
104.1
ORtg
85.0
DRtg
+19.1
NRtg
+12.0
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
13%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
-1.9
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
//current_rank
#20
of 138 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
10.6
PPG
8.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
25%
3P%
54%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
10.6
PPG
8.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
54%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.6
P85
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
8.0
P92
True shooting
54%
P92
Two-way impact
+19.1
P82
Stops
55%
P33
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
50%
24 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
4 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
53
PTS
10.6 / game
24–48
FGM–FGA
4–16
3PM–3PA
1–3
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
9
TOV
1.8 / game
0.56×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
40
REB
8.0 / game
19
OREB
21
DREB
8.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
86.1
HESI
81.6
PI
104.1
ORtg
85.0
DRtg
+19.1
NRtg
+12.0
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
54%
eFG%
13%
PIE
83.1
Team DRtg
-1.9
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.