ORtg
93.2
84th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · CHA · b. 2008
//measurables
206 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
13.2 RPGRebounding · 99th event percentile
17.3 PPGScoring load · 97th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #19 of 138 · Established
HESI
88.3
Event performance
88th event percentile
PI
82.2
Prospect index
87th event percentile
ORtg
93.2
Points / 100 poss.
84th event percentile
DRtg
71.6
Lower is better
68th event percentile
NRtg
+21.5
Two-way margin
83rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 93.2 · 84th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 71.6 · Stop% 91.2% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 168 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
88.3
88th event percentile
Prospect index
82.2
87th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.2
84th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
71.6
68th event percentile
Two-way margin
+21.5
83rd event percentile
Stop percentage
91.2%
98th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
17.3 PPG
97th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
13.2 RPG
99th event percentile
Defensive activity
5.0 stocks
92nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
52.8% TS
90th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
13.2 RPG · 100th event percentile
Rim Protection
3.2 BPG · 100th event percentile
Scorer
17.3 PPG · 97th event percentile
Activity
13.2 RPG + 5.0 defensive plays/G · 95th event percentile
Disruptor
5.0 steals + blocks per game · 92nd event percentile
Event Efficiency
53% TS on 17.3 PPG · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 88th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 93.2 ORtg and 71.6 DRtg, producing a +21.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive stops, and scoring load.
Rebounding
13.2 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
91.2% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Scoring load
17.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
93.2
84th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
17.3 PPG
97th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
52.8%
90th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
51.1%
92nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
48.3%
91st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context3.3 attempts per game
Free throws
57.7%
61st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
45.0%
87th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
71.6
68th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+13.2
99th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
91.2%
98th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
5.0 STL+BLK
92nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
62.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+21.5
83rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+14.5
88th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
88.3
88th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
82.2
87th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
23.4%
99th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
13.2 RPG
99th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
167.6
context27.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#19
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
492.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
17.3
PPG
13.2
RPG
2.0
APG
#19
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#1
RANK
57
FIELD
100%
PERCENTILE
24.2
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
17.3
PPG
13.2
RPG
2.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
17.3
P97
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
13.2
P100
True shooting
53%
P90
Two-way impact
+21.5
P83
Stops
91%
P98
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
42 made / 87 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
15 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
104
PTS
17.3 / game
42–87
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
15–26
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
79
REB
13.2 / game
30
OREB
49
DREB
13.2
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.8 / game
19
BLK
3.2 / game
22
PF
30
STL+BLK
5.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
88.3
HESI
82.2
PI
93.2
ORtg
71.6
DRtg
+21.5
NRtg
+14.5
Stable NRtg
91%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
51%
eFG%
23%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+13.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
24.2
PPG
22.8
RPG
1.4
APG
5.2
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
24.2
P97
Playmaking
1.4
P62
Rebounding
22.8
P99
True shooting
57%
P88
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
53%
48 made / 91 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
23%
5 made / 22 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
20 made / 35 attempts
Shot selection
24% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
121
PTS
24.2 / game
48–91
FGM–FGA
5–22
3PM–3PA
20–35
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
26
TOV
5.2 / game
0.27×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
114
REB
22.8 / game
43
OREB
71
DREB
22.8
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.0 / game
19
BLK
3.8 / game
17
PF
34
STL+BLK
6.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
56%
eFG%
14%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
//current_rank
#19
of 138 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
24.2
PPG
22.8
RPG
1.4
APG
3.0
SPG
3.8
BPG
—
3P%
57%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #19
//quick_read
17.3
PPG
13.2
RPG
2.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
17.3
P97
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
13.2
P100
True shooting
53%
P90
Two-way impact
+21.5
P83
Stops
91%
P98
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
42 made / 87 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
15 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
104
PTS
17.3 / game
42–87
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
15–26
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
21
TOV
3.5 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
79
REB
13.2 / game
30
OREB
49
DREB
13.2
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.8 / game
19
BLK
3.2 / game
22
PF
30
STL+BLK
5.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
88.3
HESI
82.2
PI
93.2
ORtg
71.6
DRtg
+21.5
NRtg
+14.5
Stable NRtg
91%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
51%
eFG%
23%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+13.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
5 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
24.2
PPG
22.8
RPG
1.4
APG
5.2
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
24.2
P97
Playmaking
1.4
P62
Rebounding
22.8
P99
True shooting
57%
P88
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
53%
48 made / 91 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
23%
5 made / 22 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
20 made / 35 attempts
Shot selection
24% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
121
PTS
24.2 / game
48–91
FGM–FGA
5–22
3PM–3PA
20–35
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
26
TOV
5.2 / game
0.27×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
114
REB
22.8 / game
43
OREB
71
DREB
22.8
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.0 / game
19
BLK
3.8 / game
17
PF
34
STL+BLK
6.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
56%
eFG%
14%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.