Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Kiino Nakazawa

JPN · b. 2009

//measurables

180 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.7 RPGRebounding · 47th event percentile

0.7 stocksDefensive activity · 34th event percentile

56.5
HESI v2.1: #84
of 192: 64%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #84 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

56.5

Event performance

57th event percentile

59.7

Prospect index

57th event percentile

ORtg

84.1

Points / 100 poss.

52nd event percentile

DRtg

80.4

Lower is better

61st event percentile

NRtg

+3.7

Two-way margin

56th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 84.1 · 52nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 80.4 · Stop% 60.2% · Team DRtg 79.1

Sample context

7 games · 106 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

2.7 RPG47th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.7 stocks34th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

56.5

57th event percentile

Prospect index

59.7

57th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

84.1

52nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

80.4

61st event percentile

Two-way margin

+3.7

56th event percentile

Stop percentage

60.2%

60th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.7 PPG

16th event percentile

Creation

0.4 APG

20th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

47th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.7 stocks

34th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

31.6% TS

25th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 57th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.1 ORtg and 80.4 DRtg, producing a +3.7 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, creation, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring load
1.7 PPG
16th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Creation
0.4 APG
20th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring efficiency
31.6% TS
25th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

84.1

52nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.7 PPG

16th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

31.6%

25th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

31.6%

32nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

26.3%

29th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

15.4%

context

1.9 attempts per game

Floor%

35.7%

40th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.4 APG

20th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

80.4

61st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

79.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.3

59th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

60.2%

60th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.7 STL+BLK

34th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

23.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+3.7

56th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.5

57th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

56.5

57th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

59.7

57th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.9%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

47th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

106.2

context

15.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

63.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#84

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

506.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

1.7

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.4

APG

#84

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#84/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.7

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.4

APG

0.1

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

32%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.7

P16

Playmaking

0.4

P20

Rebounding

2.7

P47

True shooting

32%

P25

Two-way impact

+3.7

P56

Stops

60%

P60

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

26%

5 made / 19 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

15%

2 made / 13 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

68% of attempts from three

●2PA 6●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.7 / game

5–19

FGM–FGA

2–13

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.4 / game

TOV

0.1 / game

3.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.7 / game

OREB

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

STL

0.7 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

56.5

HESI

59.7

84.1

ORtg

80.4

DRtg

+3.7

NRtg

+2.5

Stable NRtg

60%

Stop%

36%

Floor%

32%

eFG%

PIE

79.1

Team DRtg

-1.3

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #83Rei AndoJPN

//current_rank

#84

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #85Eliza AshbyAUS

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.7

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.4

APG

0.7

SPG

0.0

BPG

15%

3P%

32%

TS%

event_stats