back_to_rankings
Rei Ando portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Rei Ando

JPN · b. 2009

//measurables

182 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

45.6% TSScoring efficiency · 65th event percentile

2.7 RPGRebounding · 47th event percentile

57.6
HESI v2.1
#83
of 192
63%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #83 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

57.6

Event performance

58th event percentile

PI

60.6

Prospect index

57th event percentile

ORtg

82.6

Points / 100 poss.

46th event percentile

DRtg

78.2

Lower is better

70th event percentile

NRtg

+4.4

Two-way margin

57th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 82.6 · 46th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.2 · Stop% 65.1% · Team DRtg 79.1

Sample context

7 games · 102 minutes · 63% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

45.6% TS65th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG47th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

57.6

58th event percentile

Prospect index

60.6

57th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

82.6

46th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.2

70th event percentile

Two-way margin

+4.4

57th event percentile

Stop percentage

65.1%

74th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.3 PPG

38th event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG

9th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

47th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.9 stocks

39th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

45.6% TS

65th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 58th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.6 ORtg and 78.2 DRtg, producing a +4.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    65.1% Stop%

    74th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    78.2 DRtg

    70th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    45.6% TS

    65th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.3 APG

    9th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Scoring load

    3.3 PPG

    38th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  3. Defensive activity

    0.9 steals + blocks/G

    39th event percentile

    Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

82.6

46th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.3 PPG

38th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

45.6%

65th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

45.7%

74th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

39.1%

71st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

21.4%

context

2.0 attempts per game

Free throws

40.0%

21st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

37.0%

46th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.3 APG

9th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.2

70th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

79.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.9

72nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

65.1%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.9 STL+BLK

39th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

23.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+4.4

57th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.8

58th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

57.6

58th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

60.6

57th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.8%

45th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

47th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

101.5

context

14.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

62.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#83

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

506.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

3.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.3

APG

#83

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#83/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.3

APG

0.9

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

46%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P38

Playmaking

0.3

P9

Rebounding

2.7

P47

True shooting

46%

P65

Two-way impact

+4.4

P57

Stops

65%

P74

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

9 made / 23 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

21%

3 made / 14 attempts

FT

Free throws

40%

2 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

61% of attempts from three

2PA 93PA 14

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.3 / game

9–23

FGM–FGA

3–14

3PM–3PA

2–5

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.3 / game

6

TOV

0.9 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

19

REB

2.7 / game

5

OREB

14

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

6

STL

0.9 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

6

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

57.6

HESI

60.6

PI

82.6

ORtg

78.2

DRtg

+4.4

NRtg

+2.8

Stable NRtg

65%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

46%

eFG%

3%

PIE

79.1

Team DRtg

+0.9

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games102 minutes14.5 min/game63% sample weightrank #83 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Veronika Ferjancic portrait#81

    Veronika Ferjancic

    SLO

    10.1 PPG 10.7 RPG 2.7 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.3 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Dominika Pencakova portrait#82

    Dominika Pencakova

    CZE

    14.0 PPG 4.1 RPG 2.7 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.1 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Kiino Nakazawa portrait#84

    Kiino Nakazawa

    JPN

    1.7 PPG 2.7 RPG 0.4 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

3.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.3

APG

0.9

SPG

0.0

BPG

21%

3P%

46%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #83

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

0.3

APG

0.9

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

46%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P38

Playmaking

0.3

P9

Rebounding

2.7

P47

True shooting

46%

P65

Two-way impact

+4.4

P57

Stops

65%

P74

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

9 made / 23 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

21%

3 made / 14 attempts

FT

Free throws

40%

2 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

61% of attempts from three

2PA 93PA 14

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.3 / game

9–23

FGM–FGA

3–14

3PM–3PA

2–5

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.3 / game

6

TOV

0.9 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

19

REB

2.7 / game

5

OREB

14

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

6

STL

0.9 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

6

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

57.6

HESI

60.6

PI

82.6

ORtg

78.2

DRtg

+4.4

NRtg

+2.8

Stable NRtg

65%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

46%

eFG%

3%

PIE

79.1

Team DRtg

+0.9

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games102 minutes14.5 min/game63% sample weightrank #83 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.