ORtg
31.8
17th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · SEN · b. 2010
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 51st event percentile
0.8 APGCreation · 42nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #99 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
28.4
Event performance
29th event percentile
PI
36.6
Prospect index
31st event percentile
ORtg
31.8
Points / 100 poss.
17th event percentile
DRtg
59.2
Lower is better
68th event percentile
NRtg
-27.4
Two-way margin
30th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 31.8 · 17th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.2 · Stop% 66.6% · Team DRtg 56.9
Sample context
5 games · 50 minutes · 46% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Creation
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
28.4
29th event percentile
Prospect index
36.6
31st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
31.8
17th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.2
68th event percentile
Two-way margin
-27.4
30th event percentile
Stop percentage
66.6%
55th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
1.2 PPG
19th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
42nd event percentile
Rebounding
1.8 RPG
28th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
51st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
11.7% TS
7th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 29th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 31.8 ORtg and 59.2 DRtg, producing a -27.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Defensive efficiency
59.2 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
11.7% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
31.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Scoring load
1.2 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
31.8
17th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
1.2 PPG
19th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
11.7%
7th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
8.7%
8th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
8.7%
8th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context1.8 attempts per game
Free throws
33.3%
24th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
16.8%
23rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
42nd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.2
68th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.3
45th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
66.6%
55th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
51st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
14.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-27.4
30th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.1
29th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
28.4
29th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
36.6
31st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-9.1%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.8 RPG
28th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
50.4
context10.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
45.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#99
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
425.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
1.2
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.8
APG
#99
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
1.2
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
12%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.2
P19
Playmaking
0.8
P42
Rebounding
1.8
P28
True shooting
12%
P7
Two-way impact
-27.4
P30
Stops
67%
P55
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
9%
2 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
2 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
6
PTS
1.2 / game
2–23
FGM–FGA
0–9
3PM–3PA
2–6
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
9
REB
1.8 / game
3
OREB
6
DREB
1.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
7
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
28.4
HESI
36.6
PI
31.8
ORtg
59.2
DRtg
-27.4
NRtg
-17.1
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
17%
Floor%
9%
eFG%
-9%
PIE
56.9
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#99
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
1.2
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
0%
3P%
12%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #99
//quick_read
1.2
PPG
1.8
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
12%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.2
P19
Playmaking
0.8
P42
Rebounding
1.8
P28
True shooting
12%
P7
Two-way impact
-27.4
P30
Stops
67%
P55
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
9%
2 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
2 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
6
PTS
1.2 / game
2–23
FGM–FGA
0–9
3PM–3PA
2–6
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
9
REB
1.8 / game
3
OREB
6
DREB
1.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
7
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
28.4
HESI
36.6
PI
31.8
ORtg
59.2
DRtg
-27.4
NRtg
-17.1
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
17%
Floor%
9%
eFG%
-9%
PIE
56.9
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.