Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Mariam Elshenawy

EGY · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

Is this you? Claim this profile

Connect your athlete profile through an ownership review.

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

3 public film items and a published scouting assessment create the clearest current read.

3
film items: 0
scout badges: On file
scout report

Performance

2 rated events

Published event intelligence

Film

3 videos

Available for visual validation

Scouting

Published assessment on file

Human evaluation is clearly labeled

Competition

3 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Ivory Coast U18 · 2026-09-08 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

Clipvs vs Mali U18 · 2026-09-08 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip
Clipvs vs Benin U18 · 2026-09-08 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-08

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

wing · forward · spacing / shooting option · expanded offensive rebounder

wing · forward · spacing / shooting option · expanded offensive rebounder. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Secondary creation, Advantage extension, Point-of-attack defense.

Now · WingProjects · WingProjects · Forward

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

· Secondary creation
· Advantage extension
· Point-of-attack defense

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a spacing / shooting option. Can take on more offensive rebounder responsibility at the target level. secondary creator / connector usage likely scales down from the current situational load. closeout attacker usage likely scales down from the current situational load.

Defensive assignments

primary off-ball chaser (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). regular switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational gap / nail helper (grade 2.5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Secondary creation · Advantage extension

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

4 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

NCAA D3

NCAA Division III hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

49.2 performance rating · rank 98 · 7 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 84.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

41.0% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

54.4% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #22 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

85.1

Event performance

85th event percentile

80.8

Prospect index

85th event percentile

ORtg

91.5

Points / 100 poss.

95th event percentile

DRtg

57.9

Lower is better

72nd event percentile

NRtg

+33.5

Two-way margin

88th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 91.5 · 95th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 57.9 · Stop% 69.1% · Team DRtg 56.7

Sample context

6 games · 80 minutes · 57% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

66.7% TS99th event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG68th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

85.1

85th event percentile

Prospect index

80.8

85th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

91.5

95th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

57.9

72nd event percentile

Two-way margin

+33.5

88th event percentile

Stop percentage

69.1%

66th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.0 PPG

62nd event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Rebounding

3.8 RPG

57th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

58th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

66.7% TS

99th event percentile

//rated_event_history

Every rated competition

Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.

2026

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

49.2

HESI

#98

RANK

-0.5

NRtg

2026

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

85.1

HESI

#22

RANK

+33.5

NRtg

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P95
Offensive Impact
91.5 ORtg · 95th event percentile
P87
Event Impact
85.1 HESI performance · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 85th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.5 ORtg and 57.9 DRtg, producing a +33.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
66.7% TS
99th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
91.5 ORtg
95th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+33.5 NRtg
88th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

91.5

95th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.0 PPG

62nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

66.7%

99th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

66.7%

99th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

66.7%

99th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

58.8%

73rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

46.7%

96th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

57.9

72nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

56.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.3

52nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

69.1%

66th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

58th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

24.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+33.5

88th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+15.4

85th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

85.1

85th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

80.8

85th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.7%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.8 RPG

57th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

79.5

context

13.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

57.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#22

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

538.4

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5.9

PPG

5.6

RPG

1.0

APG

#98

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#22

RANK

142

FIELD

85%

PERCENTILE

5.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#98/192Event board →

5.9

PPG

5.6

RPG

1.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#22/142Event board →

5.0

PPG

3.8

RPG

1.5

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#9/48Event board →

4.6

PPG

5.0

RPG

1.4

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 · 192 ranked players

rank_above · #97Marina JosipovicSLO

//current_rank

#98

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #99Olivia LelliITA

#1
Micah Ojo
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
#96
Sarlote Skrebele
LAT
14.3 PPG 2.7 RPG 2.3 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.0

PPG

3.8

RPG

1.5

APG

0.8

SPG

0.5

BPG

—

3P%

67%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #98

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.9

PPG

5.6

RPG

1.0

APG

1.4

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.9

P62

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

5.6

P84

True shooting

43%

P54

Two-way impact

-0.5

P49

Stops

54%

P42

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

36%

14 made / 39 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

38%

3 made / 8 attempts

Free throws

53%

10 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

21% of attempts from three

●2PA 31●3PA 8

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.9 / game

14–39

FGM–FGA

3–8

3PM–3PA

10–19

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

1.4 / game

0.70×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

5.6 / game

OREB

DREB

5.6

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

49.2

HESI

53.9

84.2

ORtg

84.8

DRtg

-0.5

NRtg

-0.4

Stable NRtg

54%

Stop%

41%

Floor%

40%

eFG%

PIE

81.3

Team DRtg

-3.4

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #22

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.0

PPG

3.8

RPG

1.5

APG

2.2

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

67%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.0

P62

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

3.8

P57

True shooting

67%

P100

Two-way impact

+33.5

P88

Stops

69%

P66

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

67%

10 made / 15 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

59%

10 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.0 / game

10–15

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

10–17

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.5 / game

TOV

2.2 / game

0.69×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.8 / game

OREB

DREB

3.8

REB/G

defense

STL

0.8 / game

BLK

0.5 / game

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

85.1

HESI

80.8

91.5

ORtg

57.9

DRtg

+33.5

NRtg

+15.4

Stable NRtg

69%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

67%

eFG%

PIE

56.7

Team DRtg

-1.3

Def. lift

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026

5 GP · event rank #9

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.6

PPG

5.0

RPG

1.4

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.6

P54

Playmaking

1.4

P60

Rebounding

5.0

P65

True shooting

53%

P88

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

50%

10 made / 20 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

1 made / 4 attempts

Free throws

50%

2 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

20% of attempts from three

●2PA 16●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.6 / game

10–20

FGM–FGA

1–4

3PM–3PA

2–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.4 / game

TOV

1.6 / game

0.88×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

5.0 / game

OREB

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

STL

1.6 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

2.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

53%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.