ORtg
91.5
95th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Mariam Elshenawy
EGY · b. 2009
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact91.5 ORtg · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact85.1 HESI performance · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
66.7% TSScoring efficiency · 99th event percentile
1.5 APGCreation · 68th event percentile
- 85.1
- HESI v2.1
- #22
- of 142
- 57%
- sample weight
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #22 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
85.1
Event performance
85th event percentile
PI
80.8
Prospect index
85th event percentile
ORtg
91.5
Points / 100 poss.
95th event percentile
DRtg
57.9
Lower is better
72nd event percentile
NRtg
+33.5
Two-way margin
88th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 91.5 · 95th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 57.9 · Stop% 69.1% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 80 minutes · 57% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
66.7% TS99th event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG68th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
85.1
85th event percentile
Prospect index
80.8
85th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
91.5
95th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
57.9
72nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+33.5
88th event percentile
Stop percentage
69.1%
66th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.0 PPG
62nd event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
68th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
57th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
58th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
66.7% TS
99th event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Offensive Impact
91.5 ORtg · 95th event percentile
- P87
Event Impact
85.1 HESI performance · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 85th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.5 ORtg and 57.9 DRtg, producing a +33.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
66.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
91.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 88th event percentile
Two-way margin
+33.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.0 PPG
62nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
66.7%
99th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
66.7%
99th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
66.7%
99th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
58.8%
73rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
46.7%
96th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
68th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
57.9
72nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.3
52nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
69.1%
66th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
58th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+33.5
88th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+15.4
85th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
85.1
85th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
80.8
85th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.7%
84th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
57th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
79.5
context13.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
57.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#22
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
5.9
PPG
5.6
RPG
1.0
APG
#98
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#22
RANK
142
FIELD
85%
PERCENTILE
5.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#98/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.9
PPG
5.6
RPG
1.0
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.9
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
5.6
P84
True shooting
43%
P54
Two-way impact
-0.5
P49
Stops
54%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
14 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
10 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
●2PA 31●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
41
PTS
5.9 / game
14–39
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
10–19
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
0.70×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
39
REB
5.6 / game
13
OREB
26
DREB
5.6
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
21
PF
6
STL+BLK
0.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
49.2
HESI
53.9
PI
84.2
ORtg
84.8
DRtg
-0.5
NRtg
-0.4
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
3%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
-3.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#22/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
2.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
67%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P62
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
67%
P100
Two-way impact
+33.5
P88
Stops
69%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
67%
10 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
30
PTS
5.0 / game
10–15
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
0.69×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
10
OREB
13
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
85.1
HESI
80.8
PI
91.5
ORtg
57.9
DRtg
+33.5
NRtg
+15.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
67%
eFG%
7%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-1.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#9/48view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.4
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.6
P54
Playmaking
1.4
P60
Rebounding
5.0
P65
True shooting
53%
P88
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
10 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
4.6 / game
10–20
FGM–FGA
1–4
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
8
TOV
1.6 / game
0.88×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
25
REB
5.0 / game
6
OREB
19
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.6 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
6
PF
11
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53%
eFG%
5%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#96
#97
#99
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
0.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
67%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #98
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.9
PPG
5.6
RPG
1.0
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.9
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
5.6
P84
True shooting
43%
P54
Two-way impact
-0.5
P49
Stops
54%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
14 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
10 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
●2PA 31●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
41
PTS
5.9 / game
14–39
FGM–FGA
3–8
3PM–3PA
10–19
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
0.70×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
39
REB
5.6 / game
13
OREB
26
DREB
5.6
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
21
PF
6
STL+BLK
0.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
49.2
HESI
53.9
PI
84.2
ORtg
84.8
DRtg
-0.5
NRtg
-0.4
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
3%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
-3.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #22
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
2.2
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
67%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P62
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
67%
P100
Two-way impact
+33.5
P88
Stops
69%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
67%
10 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
30
PTS
5.0 / game
10–15
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
0.69×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
10
OREB
13
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
13
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
85.1
HESI
80.8
PI
91.5
ORtg
57.9
DRtg
+33.5
NRtg
+15.4
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
67%
eFG%
7%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-1.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.4
APG
1.6
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
53%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.6
P54
Playmaking
1.4
P60
Rebounding
5.0
P65
True shooting
53%
P88
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
10 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
4.6 / game
10–20
FGM–FGA
1–4
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.4 / game
8
TOV
1.6 / game
0.88×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
25
REB
5.0 / game
6
OREB
19
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.6 / game
3
BLK
0.6 / game
6
PF
11
STL+BLK
2.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53%
eFG%
5%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.