Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Sarlote Skrebele

LAT · b. 2009

//measurables

178 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

14.3 PPGScoring load · 96th event percentile

2.3 APGCreation · 77th event percentile

50.3
HESI v2.1: #96
of 192: 76%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #96 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

50.3

Event performance

50th event percentile

54.7

Prospect index

50th event percentile

ORtg

88.9

Points / 100 poss.

61st event percentile

DRtg

88.6

Lower is better

26th event percentile

NRtg

+0.3

Two-way margin

50th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 88.9 · 61st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.6 · Stop% 49.7% · Team DRtg 84.9

Sample context

7 games · 192 minutes · 76% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

14.3 PPG96th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG77th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

50.3

50th event percentile

Prospect index

54.7

50th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

88.9

61st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.6

26th event percentile

Two-way margin

+0.3

50th event percentile

Stop percentage

49.7%

27th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

14.3 PPG

96th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

77th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

47th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

47.3% TS

72nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P96
Scorer
14.3 PPG · 96th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 50th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 88.9 ORtg and 88.6 DRtg, producing a +0.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

Scoring load
14.3 PPG
96th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
2.3 APG
77th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive activity
1.7 steals + blocks/G
73rd event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
88.6 DRtg
26th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
49.7% Stop%
27th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

88.9

61st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

14.3 PPG

96th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

47.3%

72nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

39.9%

58th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

30.3%

39th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

29.3%

context

8.3 attempts per game

Free throws

76.3%

79th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

37.4%

48th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

77th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.6

26th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.7

35th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

49.7%

27th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

73rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

38.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+0.3

50th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+0.3

50th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

50.3

50th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

54.7

50th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.4%

77th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

47th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

192.1

context

27.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

76.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#96

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

560.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

14.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

2.3

APG

#96

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#96/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

14.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

2.3

APG

3.0

TOV/G

2.4

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

14.3

P96

Playmaking

2.3

P77

Rebounding

2.7

P47

True shooting

47%

P72

Two-way impact

+0.3

P50

Stops

50%

P27

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

30%

27 made / 89 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

17 made / 58 attempts

Free throws

76%

29 made / 38 attempts

Shot selection

65% of attempts from three

●2PA 31●3PA 58

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

100

PTS

14.3 / game

27–89

FGM–FGA

17–58

3PM–3PA

29–38

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.3 / game

TOV

3.0 / game

0.76×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.7 / game

OREB

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

STL

1.1 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

50.3

HESI

54.7

88.9

ORtg

88.6

DRtg

+0.3

NRtg

+0.3

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

40%

eFG%

PIE

84.9

Team DRtg

-3.7

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #95Madelin EliadisNZL

//current_rank

#96

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #97Marina JosipovicSLO

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

14.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

2.3

APG

1.1

SPG

0.6

BPG

29%

3P%

47%

TS%

event_stats