Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Carla Cherry

ESP · b. 2009

//measurables

173 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.7 APGCreation · 86th event percentile

2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 64th event percentile

51.3
HESI v2.1: #94
of 192: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #94 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

51.3

Event performance

51st event percentile

55.5

Prospect index

51st event percentile

ORtg

67.9

Points / 100 poss.

30th event percentile

DRtg

66.6

Lower is better

91st event percentile

NRtg

+1.3

Two-way margin

51st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 67.9 · 30th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 66.6 · Stop% 62.4% · Team DRtg 63.6

Sample context

7 games · 132 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.7 APG86th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks64th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

51.3

51st event percentile

Prospect index

55.5

51st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

67.9

30th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

66.6

91st event percentile

Two-way margin

+1.3

51st event percentile

Stop percentage

62.4%

67th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.9 PPG

33rd event percentile

Creation

2.7 APG

86th event percentile

Rebounding

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks

64th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

24.5% TS

14th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 51st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 67.9 ORtg and 66.6 DRtg, producing a +1.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
66.6 DRtg
91st event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Creation
2.7 APG
86th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
62.4% Stop%
67th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
24.5% TS
14th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
67.9 ORtg
30th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Scoring load
2.9 PPG
33rd event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

67.9

30th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.9 PPG

33rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

24.5%

14th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

23.6%

16th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

22.2%

20th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

11.1%

context

1.3 attempts per game

Free throws

27.3%

13th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

32.9%

34th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.7 APG

86th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

66.6

91st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

63.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.0

41st event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

62.4%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.0 STL+BLK

64th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

31.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+1.3

51st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+1.0

51st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

51.3

51st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

55.5

51st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.2%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

132.2

context

18.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

68.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#94

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

2.9

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.7

APG

#94

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#94/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.9

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.7

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

25%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.9

P33

Playmaking

2.7

P86

Rebounding

2.4

P39

True shooting

25%

P14

Two-way impact

+1.3

P51

Stops

62%

P67

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

22%

8 made / 36 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

11%

1 made / 9 attempts

Free throws

27%

3 made / 11 attempts

Shot selection

25% of attempts from three

●2PA 27●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.9 / game

8–36

FGM–FGA

1–9

3PM–3PA

3–11

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.7 / game

TOV

1.6 / game

1.73×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

1.9 / game

BLK

0.1 / game

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

51.3

HESI

55.5

67.9

ORtg

66.6

DRtg

+1.3

NRtg

+1.0

Stable NRtg

62%

Stop%

33%

Floor%

24%

eFG%

PIE

63.6

Team DRtg

-3.0

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #93Yu JiaCHN

//current_rank

#94

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #95Madelin EliadisNZL

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

2.9

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.7

APG

1.9

SPG

0.1

BPG

11%

3P%

25%

TS%

event_stats