Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Yu Jia

CHN · b. 2009

//measurables

175 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring load-led profile

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

4.9 PPGScoring load · 54th event percentile

42.8% TSScoring efficiency · 53rd event percentile

51.8
HESI v2.1: #93
of 192: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #93 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

51.8

Event performance

52nd event percentile

56.0

Prospect index

52nd event percentile

ORtg

96.2

Points / 100 poss.

73rd event percentile

DRtg

94.2

Lower is better

13th event percentile

NRtg

+1.9

Two-way margin

52nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 96.2 · 73rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 94.2 · Stop% 40.0% · Team DRtg 85.4

Sample context

7 games · 136 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

4.9 PPG54th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.8% TS53rd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

51.8

52nd event percentile

Prospect index

56.0

52nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

96.2

73rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

94.2

13th event percentile

Two-way margin

+1.9

52nd event percentile

Stop percentage

40.0%

3rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.9 PPG

54th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

2.9 RPG

52nd event percentile

Defensive activity

0.1 stocks

14th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.8% TS

53rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 52nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 96.2 ORtg and 94.2 DRtg, producing a +1.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Offensive efficiency
96.2 ORtg
73rd event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
40.0% Stop%
3rd event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
94.2 DRtg
13th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive activity
0.1 steals + blocks/G
14th event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

96.2

73rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.9 PPG

54th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

42.8%

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

43.4%

68th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

39.5%

74th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

18.8%

context

2.3 attempts per game

Free throws

25.0%

11th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

44.4%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

94.2

13th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-8.8

3rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

40.0%

3rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.1 STL+BLK

14th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

20.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+1.9

52nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+1.4

52nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

51.8

52nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

56.0

52nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.5%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.9 RPG

52nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

135.6

context

19.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#93

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

4.9

PPG

2.9

RPG

1.0

APG

#93

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#93/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.9

PPG

2.9

RPG

1.0

APG

0.6

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.9

P54

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

2.9

P52

True shooting

43%

P53

Two-way impact

+1.9

P52

Stops

40%

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

40%

15 made / 38 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

19%

3 made / 16 attempts

Free throws

25%

1 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

42% of attempts from three

●2PA 22●3PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.9 / game

15–38

FGM–FGA

3–16

3PM–3PA

1–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

0.6 / game

1.75×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.9 / game

OREB

DREB

2.9

REB/G

defense

STL

0.1 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

51.8

HESI

56.0

96.2

ORtg

94.2

DRtg

+1.9

NRtg

+1.4

Stable NRtg

40%

Stop%

44%

Floor%

43%

eFG%

PIE

85.4

Team DRtg

-8.8

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #92Hana JerkovicSLO

//current_rank

#93

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #94Carla CherrySpain

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.9

PPG

2.9

RPG

1.0

APG

0.1

SPG

0.0

BPG

19%

3P%

43%

TS%

event_stats