ORtg
73.9
72nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · MLI · b. 2008
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
8.5 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
4.8 stocksDefensive activity · 88th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #9 of 142 · Established
HESI
95.0
Event performance
95th event percentile
PI
87.5
Prospect index
94th event percentile
ORtg
73.9
Points / 100 poss.
72nd event percentile
DRtg
36.0
Lower is better
98th event percentile
NRtg
+38.0
Two-way margin
93rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 73.9 · 72nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 36.0 · Stop% 98.1% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
6 games · 134 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
95.0
95th event percentile
Prospect index
87.5
94th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
73.9
72nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
36.0
98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+38.0
93rd event percentile
Stop percentage
98.1%
96th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
4.2 PPG
58th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
73rd event percentile
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
4.8 stocks
88th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
30.6% TS
44th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Defensive Impact
36.0 DRtg · 98% Stop% · 97th event percentile
Event Impact
95.0 HESI performance · 94th event percentile
Rebounder
8.5 RPG · 92nd event percentile
Activity
8.5 RPG + 4.8 defensive plays/G · 89th event percentile
Disruptor
4.8 steals + blocks per game · 88th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+38.0 Net Rating · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 73.9 ORtg and 36.0 DRtg, producing a +38.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
Defensive efficiency
36.0 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
98.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
+38.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
73.9
72nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
4.2 PPG
58th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
30.6%
44th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
31.3%
53rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.0%
60th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
11.1%
context1.5 attempts per game
Free throws
0.0%
5th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
35.3%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
73rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
36.0
98th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+8.1
94th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
98.1%
96th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.8 STL+BLK
88th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
62.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+38.0
93rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+23.6
95th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
95.0
95th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
87.5
94th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.1%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.5 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
133.8
context22.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#9
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
4.2
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.7
APG
#9
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
4.2
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.7
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.2
P58
Playmaking
1.7
P73
Rebounding
8.5
P92
True shooting
31%
P44
Two-way impact
+38.0
P93
Stops
98%
P96
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
12 made / 40 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
1 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
4.2 / game
12–40
FGM–FGA
1–9
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.91×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
51
REB
8.5 / game
20
OREB
31
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
26
STL
4.3 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
17
PF
29
STL+BLK
4.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
95.0
HESI
87.5
PI
73.9
ORtg
36.0
DRtg
+38.0
NRtg
+23.6
Stable NRtg
98%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
31%
eFG%
12%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+8.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#9
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
4.2
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.7
APG
4.3
SPG
0.5
BPG
11%
3P%
31%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #9
//quick_read
4.2
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.7
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.2
P58
Playmaking
1.7
P73
Rebounding
8.5
P92
True shooting
31%
P44
Two-way impact
+38.0
P93
Stops
98%
P96
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
12 made / 40 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
1 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
4.2 / game
12–40
FGM–FGA
1–9
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.91×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
51
REB
8.5 / game
20
OREB
31
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
26
STL
4.3 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
17
PF
29
STL+BLK
4.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
95.0
HESI
87.5
PI
73.9
ORtg
36.0
DRtg
+38.0
NRtg
+23.6
Stable NRtg
98%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
31%
eFG%
12%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+8.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.