back_to_rankings
Marie Messina portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Marie Messina

Forward · CMR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

175 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

12.5 PPGScoring load · 94th event percentile

2.5 APGCreation · 85th event percentile

92.9
HESI v2.1
#10
of 142
76%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #10 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

92.9

Event performance

93rd event percentile

PI

87.0

Prospect index

93rd event percentile

ORtg

91.8

Points / 100 poss.

95th event percentile

DRtg

60.3

Lower is better

60th event percentile

NRtg

+31.5

Two-way margin

88th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 91.8 · 95th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 60.3 · Stop% 67.3% · Team DRtg 57.7

Sample context

6 games · 191 minutes · 76% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

12.5 PPG94th event percentile

Creation

2.5 APG85th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

92.9

93rd event percentile

Prospect index

87.0

93rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

91.8

95th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

60.3

60th event percentile

Two-way margin

+31.5

88th event percentile

Stop percentage

67.3%

57th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.5 PPG

94th event percentile

Creation

2.5 APG

85th event percentile

Rebounding

5.8 RPG

77th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.8 stocks

72nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.1% TS

78th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P95

    Offensive Impact

    91.8 ORtg · 95th event percentile

  • P94

    Scorer

    12.5 PPG · 94th event percentile

  • P90

    Event Impact

    92.9 HESI performance · 90th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 93rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.8 ORtg and 60.3 DRtg, producing a +31.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring load, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Offensive efficiency

    91.8 ORtg

    95th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  2. Scoring load

    12.5 PPG

    94th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Two-way margin

    +31.5 NRtg

    88th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

91.8

95th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.5 PPG

94th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

42.1%

78th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

39.3%

80th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.7%

90th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

50.0%

context

0.3 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

47.2%

98th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.5 APG

85th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

60.3

60th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

57.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.6

40th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

67.3%

57th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.8 STL+BLK

72nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

56.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+31.5

88th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+21.9

93rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

92.9

93rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

87.0

93rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

15.8%

94th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.8 RPG

77th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

191.0

context

31.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

76.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#10

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

534.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

12.5

PPG

5.8

RPG

2.5

APG

#10

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

12.5

PPG

5.8

RPG

2.5

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Assan Dakouo portrait#8

    Assan Dakouo

    Mali

    3.7 PPG 8.2 RPG 0.7 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

12.5

PPG

5.8

RPG

2.5

APG

3.7

SPG

0.2

BPG

50%

3P%

42%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #10

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.5

PPG

5.8

RPG

2.5

APG

2.3

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.5

P94

Playmaking

2.5

P85

Rebounding

5.8

P77

True shooting

42%

P78

Two-way impact

+31.5

P88

Stops

67%

P57

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

29 made / 75 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

16 made / 32 attempts

Shot selection

3% of attempts from three

●2PA 73●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

75

PTS

12.5 / game

29–75

FGM–FGA

1–2

3PM–3PA

16–32

FTM–FTA

creation

15

AST

2.5 / game

14

TOV

2.3 / game

1.07×

AST:TOV

25

FD

rebounding

35

REB

5.8 / game

18

OREB

17

DREB

5.8

REB/G

defense

22

STL

3.7 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

11

PF

23

STL+BLK

3.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

92.9

HESI

87.0

PI

91.8

ORtg

60.3

DRtg

+31.5

NRtg

+21.9

Stable NRtg

67%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

39%

eFG%

16%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

-2.6

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games191 minutes31.8 min/game76% sample weightrank #10 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.