ORtg
79.3
81st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Maimouna Traore
MLI · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
167 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
5 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
- 5
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Clipvs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
- Clipvs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
- Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
- Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
lead_guard · combo_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector
lead_guard · combo_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector. Best current separators: Finishing, Primary initiation, Ball-screen creation, Advantage extension. Primary pressure points: Gap help.
Now · Lead GuardNow · Combo GuardProjects · Lead GuardProjects · Combo Guard
Translatable strengths
- · Finishing
- · Primary initiation
- · Ball-screen creation
- · Advantage extension
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Gap help
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a on-ball creator. Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Can organize a spaced ball-screen offense as an initiator. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Can take point-of-attack assignments in a coverage with clearly defined screen rules. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A static offense asking her to create every late-clock advantage without a second handler. A low-spacing environment that removes driving and connective passing windows.
Development priorities
Gap help
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive94.3 performance rating · rank 11 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 79.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive38.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive79.3% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Complete at least eight applicable trait observations
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #11 of 142 · Established
HESI
94.3
Event performance
94th event percentile
PI
87.0
Prospect index
93rd event percentile
ORtg
79.3
Points / 100 poss.
81st event percentile
DRtg
43.4
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+35.9
Two-way margin
89th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 79.3 · 81st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 43.4 · Stop% 79.3% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
6 games · 149 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
8.8 APG99th event percentile
Scoring load
11.0 PPG90th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
94.3
94th event percentile
Prospect index
87.0
93rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.3
81st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
43.4
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+35.9
89th event percentile
Stop percentage
79.3%
82nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
90th event percentile
Creation
8.8 APG
99th event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.2 stocks
73rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.7% TS
63rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P100
Creator
8.8 APG · 100th event percentile
- P92
Event Impact
94.3 HESI performance · 92nd event percentile
- P90
Scorer
11.0 PPG · 90th event percentile
- P87
Defensive Impact
43.4 DRtg · 79% Stop% · 87th event percentile
- P86
Two-Way Impact
+35.9 Net Rating · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 94th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.3 ORtg and 43.4 DRtg, producing a +35.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Creation
8.8 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
43.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 90th event percentile
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.0 PPG
90th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.7%
63rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
35.8%
70th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
34.6%
77th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
9.5%
context3.5 attempts per game
Free throws
53.3%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.6%
81st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
8.8 APG
99th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
43.4
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.6
69th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
79.3%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.2 STL+BLK
73rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
56.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+35.9
89th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+23.1
94th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
94.3
94th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
87.0
93rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
14.8%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
148.6
context24.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#11
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
11.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
8.8
APG
#11
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#11/142Event board →
6
GP
11.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
8.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #10Marie MessinaF · Cameroonrank_below · #12Charlene PoliwaC · Cameroon
//current_rank
#11
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#9
Center · Mali
4.2 PPG 8.5 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor4.8 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity8.5 RPG + 4.8 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
11.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
8.8
APG
4.0
SPG
0.2
BPG
10%
3P%
38%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #11
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
5.7
RPG
8.8
APG
5.8
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P90
Playmaking
8.8
P100
Rebounding
5.7
P76
True shooting
38%
P63
Two-way impact
+35.9
P89
Stops
79%
P82
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
28 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
2 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
8 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 60●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
66
PTS
11.0 / game
28–81
FGM–FGA
2–21
3PM–3PA
8–15
FTM–FTA
creation
53
AST
8.8 / game
35
TOV
5.8 / game
1.51×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
34
REB
5.7 / game
13
OREB
21
DREB
5.7
REB/G
defense
24
STL
4.0 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
20
PF
25
STL+BLK
4.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
94.3
HESI
87.0
PI
79.3
ORtg
43.4
DRtg
+35.9
NRtg
+23.1
Stable NRtg
79%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
15%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+0.6
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.