Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Rihanna Mercy Nyalando

KEN · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

4.0 stocksDefensive activity · 88th event percentile

7.5 RPGRebounding · 88th event percentile

48.2
HESI v2.1: #74
of 142: 78%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #74 of 142 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

48.2

Event performance

48th event percentile

51.3

Prospect index

48th event percentile

ORtg

59.0

Points / 100 poss.

52nd event percentile

DRtg

69.1

Lower is better

34th event percentile

NRtg

-10.1

Two-way margin

48th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 59.0 · 52nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 69.1 · Stop% 67.5% · Team DRtg 69.2

Sample context

6 games · 211 minutes · 78% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

4.0 stocks88th event percentile

Rebounding

7.5 RPG88th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

48.2

48th event percentile

Prospect index

51.3

48th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

59.0

52nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

69.1

34th event percentile

Two-way margin

-10.1

48th event percentile

Stop percentage

67.5%

59th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.3 PPG

82nd event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Rebounding

7.5 RPG

88th event percentile

Defensive activity

4.0 stocks

88th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

40.7% TS

75th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P88
Disruptor
4.0 steals + blocks per game · 88th event percentile
P88
Activity
7.5 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/G · 88th event percentile
P88
Rebounder
7.5 RPG · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 48th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 59.0 ORtg and 69.1 DRtg, producing a -10.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and scoring load. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive activity
4.0 steals + blocks/G
88th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
88th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
8.3 PPG
82nd event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
69.1 DRtg
34th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

59.0

52nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.3 PPG

82nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

40.7%

75th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.7%

76th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

34.0%

76th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

28.6%

context

2.3 attempts per game

Free throws

52.6%

65th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

28.3%

52nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

69.1

34th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

69.2

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.1

65th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

67.5%

59th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

4.0 STL+BLK

88th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

68.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-10.1

48th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-9.7

48th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

48.2

48th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

51.3

48th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

9.2%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.5 RPG

88th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

211.1

context

35.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

77.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#74

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

579.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

8.3

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

#74

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#24

RANK

FIELD

51%

PERCENTILE

7.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#74/142Event board →

8.3

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#24/48Event board →

7.8

PPG

8.6

RPG

3.2

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #73Aminata FallSG · Senegal

//current_rank

#74

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #75Wejden BarhoumiC · Tunisia

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#72
Yasmina Diakhate Cardozo
Small Forward · Senegal
2.8 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.2 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7.8

PPG

8.6

RPG

3.2

APG

1.8

SPG

0.6

BPG

—

3P%

31%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #74

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

5.3

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

41%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P82

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

7.5

P88

True shooting

41%

P75

Two-way impact

-10.1

P48

Stops

68%

P59

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

34%

18 made / 53 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

4 made / 14 attempts

Free throws

53%

10 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

●2PA 39●3PA 14

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

8.3 / game

18–53

FGM–FGA

4–14

3PM–3PA

10–19

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.5 / game

TOV

5.3 / game

0.28×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

7.5 / game

OREB

DREB

7.5

REB/G

defense

STL

3.3 / game

BLK

0.7 / game

STL+BLK

4.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

48.2

HESI

51.3

59.0

ORtg

69.1

DRtg

-10.1

NRtg

-9.7

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

28%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

PIE

69.2

Team DRtg

+0.1

Def. lift

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026

5 GP · event rank #24

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.8

PPG

8.6

RPG

3.2

APG

6.0

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

31%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.8

P73

Playmaking

3.2

P86

Rebounding

8.6

P91

True shooting

31%

P41

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

29%

16 made / 56 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

1 made / 12 attempts

Free throws

35%

6 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

21% of attempts from three

●2PA 44●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.8 / game

16–56

FGM–FGA

1–12

3PM–3PA

6–17

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.2 / game

TOV

6.0 / game

0.53×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

8.6 / game

OREB

DREB

8.6

REB/G

defense

STL

1.8 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

2.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

30%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.