back_to_rankings
Yasmina Diakhate Cardozo portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Yasmina Diakhate Cardozo

Small Forward · SEN · b. 2008

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalDefensive Impact44.2 DRtg · 103% Stop% · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity6.0 RPG + 3.2 defensive plays/G · 82nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

3.2 stocksDefensive activity · 83rd event percentile

6.0 RPGRebounding · 79th event percentile

51.1
HESI v2.1
#72
of 142
58%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #72 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

51.1

Event performance

51st event percentile

PI

52.4

Prospect index

50th event percentile

ORtg

39.2

Points / 100 poss.

26th event percentile

DRtg

44.2

Lower is better

91st event percentile

NRtg

-5.1

Two-way margin

51st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 39.2 · 26th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 44.2 · Stop% 1.0% · Team DRtg 56.9

Sample context

5 games · 85 minutes · 58% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

3.2 stocks83rd event percentile

Rebounding

6.0 RPG79th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

51.1

51st event percentile

Prospect index

52.4

50th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

39.2

26th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

44.2

91st event percentile

Two-way margin

-5.1

51st event percentile

Stop percentage

103.1%

98th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.8 PPG

37th event percentile

Creation

1.2 APG

60th event percentile

Rebounding

6.0 RPG

79th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.2 stocks

83rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

25.7% TS

30th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P95

    Defensive Impact

    44.2 DRtg · 103% Stop% · 95th event percentile

  • P91

    Rim Protection

    1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile

  • P82

    Activity

    6.0 RPG + 3.2 defensive plays/G · 82nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 51st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 39.2 ORtg and 44.2 DRtg, producing a -5.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    1.0% Stop%

    98th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    44.2 DRtg

    91st event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Defensive activity

    3.2 steals + blocks/G

    83rd event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Offensive efficiency

    39.2 ORtg

    26th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    25.7% TS

    30th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

  3. Scoring load

    2.8 PPG

    37th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

39.2

26th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.8 PPG

37th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

25.7%

30th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

22.0%

29th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.0%

29th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

14.3%

context

1.4 attempts per game

Free throws

60.0%

75th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

18.5%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.2 APG

60th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

44.2

91st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

56.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+12.7

98th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

1.0%

98th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.2 STL+BLK

83rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-5.1

51st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-6.5

51st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

51.1

51st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

52.4

50th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.6%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.0 RPG

79th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

84.5

context

16.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

58.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#72

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

425.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

2.8

PPG

6.0

RPG

1.2

APG

#72

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#72/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.8

PPG

6.0

RPG

1.2

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

26%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.8

P37

Playmaking

1.2

P60

Rebounding

6.0

P79

True shooting

26%

P30

Two-way impact

-5.1

P51

Stops

1%

P98

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

5 made / 25 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

3 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

28% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

14

PTS

2.8 / game

5–25

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

3–5

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.2 / game

19

TOV

3.8 / game

0.32×

AST:TOV

5

FD

rebounding

30

REB

6.0 / game

10

OREB

20

DREB

6.0

REB/G

defense

11

STL

2.2 / game

5

BLK

1.0 / game

15

PF

16

STL+BLK

3.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

51.1

HESI

52.4

PI

39.2

ORtg

44.2

DRtg

-5.1

NRtg

-6.5

Stable NRtg

1%

Stop%

18%

Floor%

22%

eFG%

2%

PIE

56.9

Team DRtg

+12.7

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games85 minutes16.9 min/game58% sample weightrank #72 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Nour El Houda Bouassida portrait#70

    Nour El Houda Bouassida

    Shooting Guard · Tunisia

    3.3 PPG 1.2 RPG 0.2 APG

  • Shanice Mbaha portrait#71

    Shanice Mbaha

    Shooting Guard · Cameroon

    5.5 PPG 4.3 RPG 2.5 APG

  • Aminata Fall portrait#73

    Aminata Fall

    Shooting Guard · Senegal

    4.0 PPG 2.4 RPG 1.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

2.8

PPG

6.0

RPG

1.2

APG

2.2

SPG

1.0

BPG

14%

3P%

26%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #72

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.8

PPG

6.0

RPG

1.2

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

26%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.8

P37

Playmaking

1.2

P60

Rebounding

6.0

P79

True shooting

26%

P30

Two-way impact

-5.1

P51

Stops

1%

P98

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

5 made / 25 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

3 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

28% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

14

PTS

2.8 / game

5–25

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

3–5

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

1.2 / game

19

TOV

3.8 / game

0.32×

AST:TOV

5

FD

rebounding

30

REB

6.0 / game

10

OREB

20

DREB

6.0

REB/G

defense

11

STL

2.2 / game

5

BLK

1.0 / game

15

PF

16

STL+BLK

3.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

51.1

HESI

52.4

PI

39.2

ORtg

44.2

DRtg

-5.1

NRtg

-6.5

Stable NRtg

1%

Stop%

18%

Floor%

22%

eFG%

2%

PIE

56.9

Team DRtg

+12.7

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games85 minutes16.9 min/game58% sample weightrank #72 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.