ORtg
52.1
43rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Shanice Mbaha
Shooting Guard · CMR · b. 2009
//measurables
172 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.5 APGCreation · 85th event percentile
5.5 PPGScoring load · 66th event percentile
- 49.6
- HESI v2.1
- #71
- of 142
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #71 of 142 · Established
HESI
49.6
Event performance
50th event percentile
PI
52.4
Prospect index
50th event percentile
ORtg
52.1
Points / 100 poss.
43rd event percentile
DRtg
61.2
Lower is better
56th event percentile
NRtg
-9.1
Two-way margin
50th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 52.1 · 43rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 61.2 · Stop% 65.3% · Team DRtg 57.7
Sample context
6 games · 148 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.5 APG85th event percentile
Scoring load
5.5 PPG66th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
49.6
50th event percentile
Prospect index
52.4
50th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
52.1
43rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
61.2
56th event percentile
Two-way margin
-9.1
50th event percentile
Stop percentage
65.3%
47th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
66th event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
85th event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
64th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks
64th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
25.0% TS
25th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 50th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.1 ORtg and 61.2 DRtg, producing a -9.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring load. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 85th event percentile
Creation
2.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 66th event percentile
Scoring load
5.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 25th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
25.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.5 PPG
66th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
25.0%
25th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
17.2%
18th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
15.5%
17th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
7.4%
context4.5 attempts per game
Free throws
72.2%
87th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.9%
42nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.5 APG
85th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
61.2
56th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
57.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.5
34th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.3%
47th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.5 STL+BLK
64th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
42.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-9.1
50th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-8.9
50th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
49.6
50th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
52.4
50th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-2.3%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
64th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
148.0
context24.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#71
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
534.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
5.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.5
APG
#71
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#71/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.5
APG
4.7
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.5
P66
Playmaking
2.5
P85
Rebounding
4.3
P64
True shooting
25%
P25
Two-way impact
-9.1
P50
Stops
65%
P47
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
16%
9 made / 58 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
2 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
●2PA 31●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
5.5 / game
9–58
FGM–FGA
2–27
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
28
TOV
4.7 / game
0.54×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
26
REB
4.3 / game
10
OREB
16
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
49.6
HESI
52.4
PI
52.1
ORtg
61.2
DRtg
-9.1
NRtg
-8.9
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
17%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-3.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #70Nour El Houda BouassidaSG · Tunisiarank_below · #72Yasmina Diakhate CardozoSF · Senegal
//current_rank
#71
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#69
#70
#72
Small Forward · Senegal
2.8 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.2 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
5.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.5
APG
2.3
SPG
0.2
BPG
7%
3P%
25%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #71
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.5
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.5
APG
4.7
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.5
P66
Playmaking
2.5
P85
Rebounding
4.3
P64
True shooting
25%
P25
Two-way impact
-9.1
P50
Stops
65%
P47
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
16%
9 made / 58 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
7%
2 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
47% of attempts from three
●2PA 31●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
33
PTS
5.5 / game
9–58
FGM–FGA
2–27
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.5 / game
28
TOV
4.7 / game
0.54×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
26
REB
4.3 / game
10
OREB
16
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
9
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
49.6
HESI
52.4
PI
52.1
ORtg
61.2
DRtg
-9.1
NRtg
-8.9
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
25%
Floor%
17%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
57.7
Team DRtg
-3.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.