ORtg
79.9
82nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
BERETE KANTE
CIV · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
38.7% TSScoring efficiency · 65th event percentile
1.0 RPGRebounding · 15th event percentile
- 52.5
- HESI v2.1
- #69
- of 142
- 12%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #69 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
52.5
Event performance
52nd event percentile
PI
53.5
Prospect index
52nd event percentile
ORtg
79.9
Points / 100 poss.
82nd event percentile
DRtg
61.0
Lower is better
57th event percentile
NRtg
+18.8
Two-way margin
75th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 79.9 · 82nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 61.0 · Stop% 30.1% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
3 games · 8 minutes · 12% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
38.7% TS65th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG15th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
52.5
52nd event percentile
Prospect index
53.5
52nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.9
82nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
61.0
57th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.8
75th event percentile
Stop percentage
30.1%
1st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.0 PPG
15th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
15th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
13th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.7% TS
65th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 52nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 79.9 ORtg and 61.0 DRtg, producing a +18.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, creation, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 82nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
79.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 75th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.8 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 65th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 1st event percentile
Defensive stops
30.1% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 6th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 13th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.0 PPG
15th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.7%
65th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.3%
60th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
72nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.3%
90th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
61.0
57th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-19.4
1st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
30.1%
1st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
13th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
1.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.8
75th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-5.3
52nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
52.5
52nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
53.5
52nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.4%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
15th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
7.9
context2.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
11.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#69
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
1.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
#69
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#69/142Event board →
3
GP
1.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #68Ogheneochuko OnajomoNigeriarank_below · #70Nour El Houda BouassidaSG · Tunisia
//current_rank
#69
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#67
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
1.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
39%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #69
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.0
P15
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
39%
P65
Two-way impact
+18.8
P75
Stops
30%
P0
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
3
PTS
1.0 / game
1–3
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
3
REB
1.0 / game
3
OREB
0
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
0
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
52.5
HESI
53.5
PI
79.9
ORtg
61.0
DRtg
+18.8
NRtg
-5.3
Stable NRtg
30%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
0%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-19.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.